Jump to content
IGNORED

Russell Brand destroys MSNBC host


Recommended Posts

yeah pretty much.

 

 

although one could make the argument that capitalism is just as innately political (as socialism would), because private or corporate ownership is what created the immense profits of the Industrial Era

 

  Quote

 

A system of economics based on the private ownership of capital and production inputs, and on the production of goods and services for profit. The production of goods and services is based on supply and demand in the general market (market economy), rather than through central planning (planned economy). Capitalism is generally characterized by competition between producers. Other facets, such as the participation of government in production and regulation, vary across models of capitalism.

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 11/27/2013 at 8:54 AM, SR4 said:

Economics is political, and vice versa. It would be a lost cause to try to separate them from each other in practice.

I understand, but there need to be checks and balances to 'regulate' the (in)dependence, i think. In the separation of (governmental) powers, there should also be a place for the economic powers. In a transparent way. More transparent than in todays cash- lobby flows. Influence should be made transparent. So, next to the executive, judicial and legislative powers in government, there should also be economic powers made explicit, as they are, like you say, deeply entrenched in the political system in one way or another.

 

Montesquieu version 2.0 , i guess.

eww I just look back and I wrote "Any Rand" and I can't edit it

 

(and I can't upgrade my account because I'm fucking poor right now)

 

*has ocd fit*

Hahaha, i had to look three times to even see that it actually said any rand instead of ayn. My freemason mind automatically read ayn.

The IMF? The Federal Reserve? How exactly is the economic role in the political realm not transparent?

 

Besides, "entrenching" an official economic branch of gov't (im not even sure what you mean by this) is completely counter to capitalism. Capitalism was/is wildly successful because it is fluid.

  On 11/27/2013 at 9:12 AM, SR4 said:

The IMF? The Federal Reserve? How exactly is the economic role in the political realm not transparent?

 

Besides, "entrenching" an official economic branch of gov't (im not even sure what you mean by this) is completely counter to capitalism. Capitalism was/is wildly successful because it is fluid.

Good point. But that economic part is outside of the clutches of democracy. The political playingfield seems uneven. Capitalism is so much more fluid, that it's already way more globalized than the governmental branches can ever achieve.

Those Fox clowns frankly weren't any worse than the Young Turks bit someone posted earlier.

 

And I have mixed feelings about Brand in general. The cynic in me thinks it's all just promo for his Messiah Complex tour and DVD, or he's trying to see if just acting like a Messiah will automatically make you one or something. I don't necessarily disagree with much of what he's saying, but I don't think it's interesting food for thought or very constructive either, he's just super-verbose and emphatic about issues that bug lots of people and that's all there is to it.

 

Also, he sure talks a lot and loud (as the Helmet song goes) for a dude who couldn't deal with having a partner with a bigger career than his, who's her own boss. You'd think that would be a fucking cornerstone of his 21st century enlightened/awakened man skillset, but he couldn't handle it at all. Wanted her to put her career on hold and make him some babies, and dumped her when she wouldn't. Forgive me for not being so sure whether the guy is all that 'awake'.

 

 

*cheers loudly at 3:30*

If he can tell just by looking at David Cameron's face that the guy shouldn't be a prime minister then it seems fair that I could use the published statements of his ex-wife to judge his character. We can agree to disagree on that but that's how I feel.

Russell Brand totally made mincemeat out of that so called journalist. Never before has anyone been given such a trouncing in public. He said what every 16 year old WISHES they could say to their parents. With all due respect, that codger has been torn a new one.

 

Russell Brand for Prime Minister of the New Anarchy Empire!

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×