Jump to content
IGNORED

Star Wars Episode VII *MAJOR SPOILERS*


Recommended Posts

I haven't seen this one before, a little new footage and noticeably different music:

Positive Metal Attitude

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  On 12/2/2015 at 7:22 AM, Rubin Farr said:

Nice artistic rendering of all the Star Wars ships compared by size. The only place he screwed up was with the Death Stars, Death Star I was 160km in diameter, while Death Star II at Endor was 900km diameter, over 5 1/2 times the size of the original. That was hard to convey on screen, and was mentioned in the opening crawl of ROTJ, but when you're talking about planetary sized objects, that's beyond most humans' perception.

 

http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2015/11/all-the-awesome-spaceships-and-vehicles-of-star-warsin-one-cool-graphic/

jesus christ dude look at yourself my god

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

yeah, they could have told a completely new story, and it's not like they don't have an mountain of locked in and copyrighted source material to draw from already. People would of gone because star wars. ahh well.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

A member of the non sequitairiate.

TUNE IN NEXT WEEK FOR ANOTHER EXCITING INSTALMENT OF blow up the death star again we're sorry, but we're not very bright or creative.

A member of the non sequitairiate.

  On 12/2/2015 at 10:31 PM, dr lopez said:

 

  On 12/2/2015 at 7:22 AM, Rubin Farr said:

Nice artistic rendering of all the Star Wars ships compared by size. The only place he screwed up was with the Death Stars, Death Star I was 160km in diameter, while Death Star II at Endor was 900km diameter, over 5 1/2 times the size of the original. That was hard to convey on screen, and was mentioned in the opening crawl of ROTJ, but when you're talking about planetary sized objects, that's beyond most humans' perception.

 

http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2015/11/all-the-awesome-spaceships-and-vehicles-of-star-warsin-one-cool-graphic/

jesus christ dude look at yourself my god

 

 

A member of the non sequitairiate.

there's a lot of stuff i'd want the death star for other than the fact that it's a death star, what powers it for example. The physics behind, the energy beams and tractor beams and how does one create artificial gravity and warp into hyperspace or whatever they call that in the star wars universe. So much cool tech you could extract from that one device. or even extract from a small cruiser.

 

/buys limpy a mickey mouse mask

A member of the non sequitairiate.

lol it's all fantasy in some way, even things that self identify themselves as 'hard' science fiction really only rely on what we now think can be done extrapolating from those laws that we currently think underpin everything and so is set a 'fantasy' within this quite fantastical framework. For example novels from 40 years ago had people travelling to the stars, and yet the characters still find themselves bound by old age and using clunky space weapons when in parallel they had figured out faster than light travel. Clearly this then is a fantasy, divorced from prospective reality.

 

Then there's star wars, remember the third of authur c. clarkes laws of prediction; "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Therefore even the force 'could' perhaps have an underpinning less fantastical than we currently understand. Certainly the rest of the vaguely explained technology could come under the classification of science fiction, given the main tools utilized have a technological underpinning rather than, something magical. Ships need power to run, parts and labour are required, it's a technological economy that is science fiction.

 

Sorry man, i'm trying to put off sleep so being a bitch and counterpointing your point as an exercise in your frustration. And if you couldn't figure out what i was saying, i am stating that stuff people think is science fiction can be fantasy, and that star wars veers more into the science fiction territory. But it's all really a fantasy, a science fiction fantasy.

 

hah [-; luvf dlee ..

A member of the non sequitairiate.

Guest bitroast

yeah it's a hybrid of the two.

it's just one of those things where i don't think the creators put much thought into the logistics of these things beyond .. picking the most iconic, best looking ships. aesthetics and strong iconology over> logistics.

 

so.. the instant the question of logistics of physicalities comes into star wars (and specifically star wars more than .. star trek, 2001, alien, etc. etc. etc.) my brain just shuts off. the moment u spend more time thinking about something the creators didnt think about. no thxxx

fair enough, if you're so bound by their imagination and not yours. heheheh schlam [-;

A member of the non sequitairiate.

  On 12/3/2015 at 9:08 AM, bitroast said:

u wot.

u avin a go?

 

pls get back to me once u have figured out the physics behind operating the death star :)

 

It's all dilithium crystals, suspended in an posiproton antimatter matter cage, that flux the z manifold into and through sub space aether link to create a locked grid within which a neutral energy state is reached in the surrounding architecture of the death star. Localized instability grids, then tweek the energy flow into subspace in their sector, creating the necessary gravity for that area.

 

As for how they generate the vast amount of energy required, it's quite simple really. Given the above revelations ..............................

A member of the non sequitairiate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×