Why was John Ehrlichman banned?

I'm still not quite sure what the alt-right is

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:40 AM, ambermonk said:

I'd have to back Madam C up on this one. Unwarranted privacy invasion is rather classless.

How is that privacy invasion, she's a public figure you can google

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:54 AM, roasty said:

 

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:40 AM, ambermonk said:

I'd have to back Madam C up on this one. Unwarranted privacy invasion is rather classless.

 

How is that privacy invasion, she's a public figure you can google

if i tracked down a picture of a member of your family on the internet and used it as my avatar, would that be acceptable behaviour? no it wouldn't. please desist.

Strawman.

  On 11/26/2015 at 10:02 AM, roasty said:

Strawman.

BS

  On 11/25/2015 at 9:58 PM, Hoodie said:

....their music preferences are defined by obscurity and harshness, not by artistry, beauty....

huh?

Everybody is just gross-generalising about everyone else.

See?

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:40 AM, ambermonk said:

I'd have to back Madam C up on this one. Unwarranted privacy invasion is rather classless.

Is it really privacy invasion if they're putting it up on television?

This is what Snowden was trying to warn about

I can't believe my eyes here.

  On 11/26/2015 at 10:26 AM, ThatSpanishGuy said:

 

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:40 AM, ambermonk said:

I'd have to back Madam C up on this one. Unwarranted privacy invasion is rather classless.

 

Is it really privacy invasion if they're putting it up on television?

so you are privy to information about who JE is and you use that information to find pictures of him and his family on the internet and post them on here?

he clearly hasn't given you permission to post his identity on this site, and neither has his sister. are you stupid or just plain ignorant?

Ad hominem.

MOVING THE GOALPOASTS

  On 11/26/2015 at 10:38 AM, roasty said:

This is what Snowden was trying to warn about

hi guys, can everyone

you can't Best Answer a thread that is not yours

  On 11/26/2015 at 10:45 AM, MDM Chaos said:

 

  On 11/26/2015 at 10:26 AM, ThatSpanishGuy said:

 

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:40 AM, ambermonk said:

I'd have to back Madam C up on this one. Unwarranted privacy invasion is rather classless.

 

Is it really privacy invasion if they're putting it up on television?

 

so you are privy to information about who JE is and you use that information to find pictures of him and his family on the internet and post them on here?

 

he clearly hasn't given you permission to post his identity on this site, and neither has his sister. are you stupid or just plain ignorant?

 

I wouldn't be aware of Russia Today if he didn't post his interview on her show. It even won the IDM Emmy for best journalism.

  On 11/26/2015 at 11:05 AM, usagi said:

you can't Best Answer a thread that is not yours

 

Says who? I didn't know you had your Ph.D in Answerology.

TEXAS SHARPSHOOTER

Something is rotten in the state of vattern

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:18 AM, MDM Chaos said:

why are you guys bringing his sister into this? i don't see how his actions on this forum are any of her responsibility. you guys are cruising for a bruising.

WATMM is largely misogynist (you already knew this). This is the conservative actions that I spoke earlier upon with which he is frustrated.

  On 11/26/2015 at 11:18 AM, Braintree said:

 

  On 11/26/2015 at 9:18 AM, MDM Chaos said:

why are you guys bringing his sister into this? i don't see how his actions on this forum are any of her responsibility. you guys are cruising for a bruising.

 

WATMM is largely misogynist (you already knew this). This is the conservative actions that I spoke earlier upon with which he is frustrated.

 

[something other than South Park PC privilege-checking shenanigans]

is there like an alternative watmm you're all talking about? what mysogyny? what conservatives? zeff and the bros are considered vocal clowns, not some representatives of general watmm opinion.

I WISH I HAD A MAGIC WAND