Forum Discussion/Issues

  On 11/22/2019 at 1:41 AM, user said:

Things are getting a bit abstract for me. Is this web 3.0? Total integration of everything into everything? I want to be ready but I'm not sure I am.

Expand  

Yeah, I need to contact the developer - I am working on... something (not ready to say yet) and I think it is interfering with CHATMM.

  On 11/22/2019 at 5:37 AM, Stickfigger said:

What's up with the leaderboard ? On some of the recent days there is just a black bar instead of a user , and it only will show first and second , second and third , or first and third place users ?

Which skin? I just looked and all seems normal. Can you provide a screenshot?

Being able to embed .mp4 and .webm would be nice.

  On 11/22/2019 at 6:52 PM, Joyrex said:

Yeah, I need to contact the developer - I am working on... something (not ready to say yet) and I think it is interfering with CHATMM  

It’s a small price to pay for the WATMM flesh interface we’ve collectively been longing for. 

  On 11/22/2019 at 8:02 PM, ManjuShri said:

Being able to embed .mp4 and .webm would be nice.

 

Expand  

Odd - according to the forum software, we should support both... I'm inquiring

  On 11/22/2019 at 9:59 PM, user said:

It’s a small price to pay for the WATMM flesh interface we’ve collectively been longing for. 

It's not as futuristic as that... in fact, WATMM had it at one time a long, long, time ago...

When browsing the site on mobile, clicking the WATMM stylized banner at the top isn't doing anything for me at all. Where browsing on a reg browser takes me back to the home page. 

It's no biggie for me, just thought I'd point it out in case it's something simple.

  On 11/22/2019 at 10:34 PM, StephenG said:

When browsing the site on mobile, clicking the WATMM stylized banner at the top isn't doing anything for me at all. Where browsing on a reg browser takes me back to the home page. 

It's no biggie for me, just thought I'd point it out in case it's something simple.

So on mobile it's not clickable?

Unrelated: I have a problem.

Luke Vibert is blowing out my layout...

Maybe this has been brought up before, but I just realized I'm no longer an Expert Knob Twiddler. Merely a Knob Twiddler.

  On 11/25/2019 at 12:20 AM, Braintree said:

Maybe this has been brought up before, but I just realized I'm no longer an Expert Knob Twiddler. Merely a Knob Twiddler.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

And I’m just a Knob but you don’t see me complaining

Can't believe nobody has questions or remarked on the 'problem' I'm having...

  On 11/26/2019 at 5:36 PM, Joyrex said:

Can't believe nobody has questions or remarked on the 'problem' I'm having...

Time to cut somebody!

eenie meenie miney mo

Get rid of plaid. Or add Fleshbulb, Vsnars and Brian Wlatzera 

Ceephax, Clark and Luke Vibert don't belong, IMHO. They're clearly not in the same league when it comes to how universally revered they are.

This is not because I don't like them, btw. In fact, I really do like Luke Vibert but I do recognize Aphex, Autechre and Squarepusher are in a whole different category.

lol

  On 11/26/2019 at 5:36 PM, Joyrex said:

Can't believe nobody has questions or remarked on the 'problem' I'm having...

Have the layout as 3x3 my dear

  On 11/27/2019 at 11:35 AM, mcbpete said:

Have the layout as 3x3 my dear

This is the correct answer.

I was gonna try to do a mock up but I couldn't even figure out how to go to that page.

  On 11/27/2019 at 11:35 AM, mcbpete said:

Have the layout as 3x3 my dear

It's responsive, love - it reflows based on the width of the viewport... I guess my very subtle joke flew entirely over the heads of everyone!

  On 11/27/2019 at 1:43 PM, acid1 said:

This is the correct answer.

I was gonna try to do a mock up but I couldn't even figure out how to go to that page.

That's the point I was trying to make - I'm working on a Discography for WATMM! Members will be able to contribute entries and reviews of releases!

This is otherwise known as... CONTENT!!!!

In fact, I'd appreciate some feedback on the fields of information for a release - have I covered all the bases here?

.torrent/magnet: link ?

Maybe this is already possible and I’m missing it because of my chronic stupid but it’d be nice to be able to do searches in threads. Mostly to check if I’m double posting in the describe your last shit thread but might come in handy for other things as well. 
 

  On 11/27/2019 at 6:47 PM, mcbpete said:

.torrent/magnet: link ?

Erm, no (unless we want WATMM shut down sharpish) - but linking to Bleep for an audio sample would be a good idea (if feasible)

  On 11/27/2019 at 9:46 PM, user said:

Maybe this is already possible and I’m missing it because of my chronic stupid but it’d be nice to be able to do searches in threads. Mostly to check if I’m double posting in the describe your last shit thread but might come in handy for other things as well. 
 

Click into the search box, and then change the setting from 'Everywhere' to 'This Topic'.

  On 11/27/2019 at 6:30 PM, Joyrex said:

In fact, I'd appreciate some feedback on the fields of information for a release - have I covered all the bases here?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

What's the benefit of having this over something that already exists? Discogs already has all of this. You can even review releases there. 

  On 11/27/2019 at 9:57 PM, Joyrex said:

Erm, no (unless we want WATMM shut down sharpish) 

It's a little worrying that you thought I was being even remotely serious 

  On 11/27/2019 at 9:57 PM, Joyrex said:

Erm, no (unless we want WATMM shut down sharpish) - but linking to Bleep for an audio sample would be a good idea (if feasible)

Click into the search box, and then change the setting from 'Everywhere' to 'This Topic'.

Expand  

OMG thank you

  On 11/27/2019 at 10:15 PM, andrd said:

What's the benefit of having this over something that already exists? Discogs already has all of this. You can even review releases there. 

That's a good point, and I thought about that - the biggest difference (and you may have not been around way back when WATMM had a discography) is unlike Discogs, there is more of a 'narrative' than what they supply (e.g., history of the release, fun factoids and interesting notes about the production, origins of track names, etc.) that Discogs has either none of or is inconsistent at best. Plus, I think it will be a good way to engage the community here to build up what will hopefully be the most complete and valuable collection of data on the artists we cover.

  On 11/27/2019 at 10:17 PM, mcbpete said:

It's a little worrying that you thought I was being even remotely serious 

I know... but just in case anyone else would remotely think we'd do that...