Perlence Subrange 6-36

variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly?

i'm interested!

  nsixqatsi said:

  modey said:

  nsixqatsi said:

if someone wants to pm me this, that'd be cool.

 

I like it quite a bit.

why do people keep saying this? are you really that poor that you can't afford a couple of dollars for a track?

I'm made out of mold.

This retort encapsulates the limitations of the n00b.

An epic fail.

  o00o said:

somebody pls send me the Quaristice.Quadrange.ep.ae

 

thx

don't be a fucking cheapskate

thx

this track is ace by the way.

  modey said:

variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly?

 

i'm interested!

ummm... indesign and darwin!

oh! i didn't know darwin was indesign based now.. i guess they had to change from quark so they wouldn't go out of business heheh.

  modey said:

oh! i didn't know darwin was indesign based now.. i guess they had to change from quark so they wouldn't go out of business heheh.

yeah... that's the only way i know it... i've only been doing this for about 2 months now... i was bored one day caught up with work and the dude that normally does it was backed up and needed help... so i kinda taught myself how to do it!

i just learned directsmile, it's a pretty awesome program. variable imagery and such. my favourite demo image is the slightly underaged looking girl in a bath writing a person's name in the bubbles:

you can even see a nipple if you look hard enough!

  modey said:

variable data! what are you using? directsmile? xmpie? yours truly?

 

i'm interested!

everytime i see your icon, i get momentarily confused, trying to decide if it's peter gabriel or peter christopherson

  Dr Clitterhaus said:

  nsixqatsi said:

  modey said:

  nsixqatsi said:

if someone wants to pm me this, that'd be cool.

 

I like it quite a bit.

why do people keep saying this? are you really that poor that you can't afford a couple of dollars for a track?

I'm made out of mold.

This retort encapsulates the limitations of the n00b.

An epic fail.

 

boo hoo new person joins forum mostly so he can occasionaly get something new pmed to him for the easy.

maybe i should READ THE RULES

There's something a bit rough and ugly sounding about this track that makes it hard to enjoy. I'm not talking about deliberate darkness, like in Confield. It's something irritating.

How long is this track?

I love the "slowed-down Basic Channel" comparison. Really curious.

  Hanratty said:

How long is this track?

 

I love the "slowed-down Basic Channel" comparison. Really curious.

58:35

id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark.

  jules said:

id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark.

Same here.

Much as I've loved a lot of Autechre's music, I do reckon if Clark put that track out everyone would rip it to shreds.

I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:)

i've yet to listen to more than one minute of this track

maybe i will now.

  thehauntingsoul said:

I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:)

IM SURE ANY MUSIC ON MUSHROOMS IS AMAZING...MEAT BEAT MANIFESTOS 99% WILL ALWAYS BE MY FAV MUSHROOM MUSIC AND THE PSYCHIC WARRIORS OV GAIA ALBUM :-)

this track is the timeline of every living organism on this planet - from birth and life to death and silence....muy bien

The Subrange sets, Losid 2 and Suns versions were all more enjoyable for me than the Range set and Perlence itself, which I felt were kinda throwaways to begin with. My only issue with Subrange 6-36 is the clipping-like reverb on some of the bass hits are too jarring to truly feel like it has a purpose there. Otherwise, it's an average at best ambient track and I don't mind it. Altibzz/Altichyre and the Notwo/Nofour sets more than make up for it. If they won't do a 'studio live' album, I can only hope they do a more ambient album along those lines.

  November said:

The Subrange sets, Losid 2 and Suns versions were all more enjoyable for me than the Range set and Perlence itself, which I felt were kinda throwaways to begin with. My only issue with Subrange 6-36 is the clipping-like reverb on some of the bass hits are too jarring to truly feel like it has a purpose there. Otherwise, it's an average at best ambient track and I don't mind it. Altibzz/Altichyre and the Notwo/Nofour sets more than make up for it. If they won't do a 'studio live' album, I can only hope they do a more ambient album along those lines.

Ah, that's what it was. I thought there was something wrong with my brand new headphones!

  jcounts said:

..And I don't want to get high in order to enjoy it! LOL, a flushing toilet sounds cool when you're stoned. Plus, that would make it a really expensive track if you had to go score each time you listened. Bleep should put "Suggested Retail Price 50 Euros as You're Gonna Need Some Skunk for this One."

:laughing: exactly

  thehauntingsoul said:

I listened to this track in its entirety whilst tripping on shrooms this weekend and I've got to say it was really deep, absolutely mind-blowing experience:)

you need better drug music.

  Lianne said:

  jules said:

id be curious to hear what people thought of this if the exact track was released by say, chris clark.

 

Same here.

 

Much as I've loved a lot of Autechre's music, I do reckon if Clark put that track out everyone would rip it to shreds.

I don't care who released this, it sucks

There are a lot of experimental artists who have released better ambient tracks

i think clipping-like effect is what makes this track on its front.

Anybody tried to compress the time by 0.1?