Jump to content
IGNORED

Mad Men


Guest the anonymous forumite

Recommended Posts

Guest the anonymous forumite

Starts this sunday.

 

MAD-1-articleLarge.jpg

 

  Quote

July 18, 2010

Television

Back to Work for ‘Mad Men’

By ALESSANDRA STANLEY

 

 

 

“WHO is Don Draper?” is the question that opens the premiere of the fourth season of “Mad Men.” And that’s an insider’s joke, a wink at viewers who have spent three years burrowing into the cryptic ad man’s buried secrets and damaged psyche.

 

AMC’s drama about Manhattan’s advertising world in the early 1960s isn’t just a cult favorite anymore; “Mad Men” has become a cultural phenomenon much in the way “The Sopranos” once was. The two shows are mirror opposites of course.

 

“The Sopranos” amused viewers with unexpected glimpses of bourgeois ordinariness — lawn mowing, school meetings, psychotherapy — inside the scary, alien world of organized crime. “Mad Men” offers a far more commonplace milieu — the rat race — and finds comedy in the distortions of a rear-view mirror. There lies the spectacle of people just like us doing things that today seem scary and alien, like smoking, drinking old-fashioneds at lunch, letting children play with dry-cleaner bags.

 

It’s a series set in the days of ice-cold martinis and cold war anxiety that has seduced contemporary fashion, advertising and even the English language. There are “Mad Men” Barbie and Ken dolls, a “Mad Men” clothing line at Banana Republic and pop culture books like “Mad Men and Philosophy: Nothing Is as It Seems.” The term “mad men” has become an adjective, a shorthand way to describe things that are louche, elegant and dissipated in an antediluvian way.

 

And accordingly there is “Mad Men” overload in the air and, in some corners, even a backlash. Don’s angst at times grew tiresome, as did his marital woes. Viewers yearned to get away from the home front and back to the office skirmishes at his agency, Sterling Cooper. Fortunately the series’s creator, Matthew Weiner, has found a way to finesse “Mad Men” fatigue at the end of the third season by giving his story a mulligan.

 

Sterling Cooper is starting over, as Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce, and so is Don. When the series began in 2007, its main characters were established, slightly jaded players in a field that was on top of its game in a nation still puffed up with postwar confidence and superpower brio. The advertising firm was so successful, despite its disreputable office parties, that it was practically white shoe. And its creative director, Don Draper (Jon Hamm), married to lovely Betty (January Jones) with two lovely children in a lovely suburb, had little to prove, except, perhaps his effortless prowess as an extramarital ladies’ man.

 

But when Sterling Cooper’s British parent company was sold at the end of last season to an even bigger advertising behemoth, Don and his colleagues broke away and lost their complacency.

 

Suddenly they became small and scrappy without the huge accounts, vast office space and bottomless expenses of yesteryear. And that final episode, as Don banded his loyalists together to start a new firm, was the most exhilarating moment of the season.

 

Now, at the beginning of Season 4, which begins next Sunday, it’s a year later, and the executives of Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce go on cattle calls to woo clients. Contracts melt away. The business is precarious and copywriters stoop to publicity stunts to gin up business.

 

His personal life is just as altered. Betty is freshly embarked on a new marriage with Henry Francis (Christopher Stanley), an older man and an aide to Nelson Rockefeller. Henry, who has grown children from a previous marriage, promises Betty a better life — though this one comes with a scornful mother-in-law.

 

And Don, who had women falling over themselves trying to get him into bed when he was married, finds himself alone in a dark Greenwich Village apartment, shining his own shoes and going out on blind dates. Being a bachelor back in those days, before the pill was widely used by single women and the arrival of “The Sensuous Woman,” did not automatically include swinging. Don tries to kiss a young woman in the back of a cab but can’t get any further. She won’t let him accompany her to the door to the Barbizon, then a women-only hotel, because, as she puts it coyly, “I know that trick.”

 

“Mad Men” keeps confounding expectations — the ’60s fashion, mores and cultural landmarks keep getting more familiar, but the characters maintain an elusive weirdness. Betty looks like Grace Kelly, but she seems blandly prosaic — except when she picks up a BB gun and shoots the neighbor’s pigeons, a cigarette dangling from her perfectly curved lips.

 

Pete Campbell (Vincent Kartheiser) would be just another irritating office brown-noser, a prep school Sammy Glick, except that he too has a screw loose and a mystical rapport with firearms. Peggy (Elisabeth Moss) should be an easily identified Rona Jaffe heroine — an unmarried career woman breaking the barriers of sexism — but she too is peculiar and enigmatic. Even Don and Betty’s forlorn daughter, Sally (Kiernan Shipka), is more strange than sad.

 

“Mad Men” is a period piece that reverses the template. Historical dramas like “The Tudors” or “John Adams” sift through a remote, archaic culture to highlight the most familiar and contemporary concerns of historical characters. “Mad Men” wallows in the comfort of a recent and well-known past by way of characters who are always a little opaque and unknowable.

 

The narrative snakes through a Life magazine timeline of political turmoil and social change — the John F. Kennedy assassination is a transforming event, and so are the poems of Frank O’Hara and the songs of Bob Dylan. In the season premiere, a character cites the killing of Andrew Goodman, the civil rights volunteer who was murdered with two co-workers in Mississippi. It’s a mention that marks the year as 1964 and the mood of the country as nearing a boiling point. Or as one character puts it, “The world is so dark right now.”

 

But it isn’t always obvious to those living in it. Copywriters goof around at work. Peggy and a young colleague jokingly coo the names “Marsha” and “John” at each other, an oblique nod to Stan Freberg, an ad writer and comedian who had a huge hit in 1951 with a recorded single, “John & Marsha,” a soap opera parody in which actors intone the words “John” and “Marsha” over and over to organ music.

 

Don has dinner at Jimmy’s La Grange, a Midtown restaurant favored by advertising executives where chicken à la Kiev is a specialty, and diners are given bibs to protect them from the splatter of butter.

 

Those kinds of oblique references tether the fictional world of Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce to the real advertising world of those times. That’s partly professional pride on the part of the writers, who dread complaints from old ad executives. Emeritus “mad men” can be as finicky and exacting about the historical details of their bygone days as Civil War re-enactors are about the uniforms worn at Bull Run.

 

But those cues also hold out the promise that the coming season will once again pivot the story on the workplace. It’s where “Mad Men” started and where it was best. A fresh start at the rat race is just what the series needs.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

I FUCKING LOVE MAD MEN

 

I'm going to wait a few episodes before downloading. I'll probably get all of Treme before watching this as the wait between weeks kills me.

 

Series 4 doesn't start over here until 2011, fucking joke.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1384174
Share on other sites

Guest the anonymous forumite

It was ok, not amazing but that's pretty normal for mad men, it always starts gently and builds up slowly. One or two things were a bit too much, such as the slapping in bed. But otherwise decent. For some reason, all the Peggy scenes bored me(redundance ?). Really liked the scene were he gets mad at the Johnson & Johnson guys. It's pretty obvious that Don's character is gonna be more and more "spectacular" from now on, it's bound to happen. We've been used to subtle personality disorders from him ,it's all going to hell now. The writer told some magazine that only 5 seasons were planned, but AMC is trying to extend that. Wait and see.

Edited by the anonymous forumite
Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1384256
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

i think anyone else who saw the finale will agree that it was very very bad. the thing with don and his new secretary is forced and awkward. a lot of drawn out sentimental scenes which are totally unbelievable, and barely any interesting business going on. ends on a dull note with no cliffhanger and no real reason to keep watching except confusion as to why any of this random remarriage crap is happening.

 

good things about the season - i liked the new office. the old secretary was a great character, especially her death, a seriously hilarious scene. the interactions between don and peggy were good as usual, and the scenes with glen and sally were great, he's one of my favorite characters. the cameo by RAY WISE was a treat, i'm really hoping he comes back as a regular character. also, i liked that there were fewer scenes with betty, she's just getting irritating to watch.

 

bad things - the new employees, the lack of business (which is always more interesting than the characters' personal lives), the horrible voice-over scenes with don writing in his little notebook about bettering himself. sal is gone for good it seems, and joan might as well be at this point; they made it seem like she'd have a bigger role again this season, but everything she does now feels forced.

 

i dont know what to think at this point - they'll have to work really hard to make that finale lead anywhere entertaining. but i did like a lot of the recent episodes. the writers are still clever, but they're obviously bored.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448579
Share on other sites

Guest Mirezzi

It ended on a spectacularly fucked up note...no denying that. The entire secretary deal was just, so, fucked, up. My first reaction was that it felt quite unmotivated upon; however, the more I reflected on it, Draper is still not quite ready to be Wittman again. He might never be ready. The psychologist babe was not gonna let him be Draper.

 

Still...wtf. Something is very odd about this snaggletooth lady. She was an already shit-boring character and now she's married to the flagship. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448738
Share on other sites

  On 11/2/2010 at 5:01 PM, Benedict Cumberbatch said:

didnt feel like a season finale that is for sure.

 

this. i watched it not knowing it was the finale, didn't realize it until i was checking out tpb the next week, and there was no new episode. :rolleyes:

 

i was expecting some crazy cliffhanger with her getting hit by a car... or something.

 

also, the magically disappearing government threat plotline, wtf was up with that. things almost got exciting.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448770
Share on other sites

Jessica Paré is so hot, the more the better :emb:

*** This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation

*** helping America into the New World...

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448796
Share on other sites

Guest the anonymous forumite
  On 11/2/2010 at 5:05 PM, The Overlook said:

It ended on a spectacularly fucked up note...no denying that. The entire secretary deal was just, so, fucked, up. My first reaction was that it felt quite unmotivated upon;

 

I thought that too at first, it was way too quick and spectacular. But actually there were many moments in this season that pointed at Don's impulsiveness. This impulsiveness he's been struggling with and that is probably gonna lose him.

 

  On 11/2/2010 at 5:51 PM, chaosmachine said:

 

i was expecting some crazy cliffhanger with her getting hit by a car... or something.

 

There's never been a cliffhanger in Mad Men.

Edited by the anonymous forumite
Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448817
Share on other sites

  On 11/2/2010 at 7:05 PM, the anonymous forumite said:

There's never been a cliffhanger in Mad Men.

 

uh.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448851
Share on other sites

  On 11/2/2010 at 7:43 PM, chaosmachine said:
  On 11/2/2010 at 7:05 PM, the anonymous forumite said:

There's never been a cliffhanger in Mad Men.

 

uh.

losing the company and starting a new firm when your wife finds out your dark secrets and leaves you.. just another day in the life eh..

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1448951
Share on other sites

the middle episodes of this season were some of, if not the best ones they have done. the end of the season definitely dipped off in a major way though.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58105-mad-men/#findComment-1449363
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×