NOT ENOUGH TICKETS !

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:00 PM, elusive4 said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 10:05 PM, Awepittance said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 12:09 AM, elusive4 said:

  On 6/28/2011 at 11:36 PM, Awepittance said:

elusive, serious question: do you have evidence to believe Sean and Rob recorded either album in 24-bit at some point?

 

no - did you read the post that stated why i made the request?

 

modey made a point that may render the request useless, if in fact

 

i did but i still didn't understand where you got the idea that any of the source material for either album let alone that one track you keep talking about was recorded in anything more than 16-bit. Or were you just crossing your fingers on the off chance it was and that it's been leaked on the net?

 

did you not see the first post of the thread that it was a petition to have released?

sad i've had to explain this to about 3 members now in this thread to go back and read the first post.

What's sad about this is you seem to have undiagnosed asperger's syndrome, the inability to have normal social interactions with people.

how do you actually maintain conversations with real human beings in actual life? its like you cant even answer a basic question without acting extremely exasperated, and as of yet you still didn't answer my question at all or explain to the forum why you imagined in your own head such a 24-bit version of these albums exist. In case you still didn't get what i was asking.... here is the question a final time:

what compelled you to 'petition' for such a release not knowing if one exists or not?

WATMM

  On 6/30/2011 at 10:25 PM, sljiva said:

Nice to see pseudo-elitist self important pricks with heads deep in their asses defeated again

you have something to add you say it in the thread not to yourself in the corner under your breath because you're too chicken shit to say in the open in front of everyone.

i dont think Bob Dobalina was defeated - he just has reading comprehension challenges.

  On 6/30/2011 at 10:30 PM, Awepittance said:

What's sad about this is you seem to have undiagnosed asperger's syndrome, the inability to have normal social interactions with people.

you have spent so much time on watmm

wen is analogue wings manning up to his award gift

  On 6/30/2011 at 10:30 PM, Awepittance said:

In case you still didn't get what i was asking.... here is the question a final time:

 

you are not in command, here

stop presenting yourself as if you have the authority to ask questions here. it's going to take at least 2,000 more tickets from the skeeball game to be able to exchange them in for a stuffed animal or the change to ask me a question. get back and try again. not enough tickets.

elusive, you are aware that you're kinda making a total tit of yourself in this thread, yeah?

  On 7/1/2011 at 3:22 AM, kaini said:

elusive, you are aware that you're kinda making a total tit of yourself in this thread, yeah?

ive contributed more to this forum than you have.

care to wager a poll ?

i don't see how you could demonstrate this one way or the other. for someone who seems to believe in objective demonstration of sound quality, you don't really seem to have a clear grasp of the scientific method.

  On 7/1/2011 at 4:48 AM, kaini said:

i don't see how you could demonstrate this one way or the other. for someone who seems to believe in objective demonstration of sound quality, you don't really seem to have a clear grasp of the scientific method.

care to post credentials? care to post publishings?

actually - i take it back. care to post reading comprehension? maybe you could quote me in any portion of my commentary where i stated i could hear any difference between 16bit and 24bit.

don't feel too negative when you finally come to the conclusion that you are the slowest of the bunch and the rest of your henchmen dozed off when they realized what had happened to them.

read. comprehension. go back and find a quote where i state what you assume i mean. you will not find it. my point proven - all on watmm have a desire to lash out once anyone comments regarding lossless or high quality digital files. look how quickly it took for a "320k vs wav" post to arise - and how quickly it was shutdown upon testing by myself and another.

face it - you are reading in my commentary what you want to read, instead of actually reading what i am saying. ah, but youarenotsosmart! so again, i insist! - you quote me on which i state directly i can hear any difference between 16bit and 32bit, regardless of any request i may make for such files. you fell for the trap and now you squirm like lttl grrl. unable to save face. you lack everything that this forum stands for, for you are kaini.

okay. let me lay it out as clearly as i can. you're petitioning on a forum that autechre probably read once a month if, in fact ever, for 24-bit rereleases of albums where there is no proof that a 24-bit original recording exists.

not only that, but you're pushing the fact that 24-bit recordings are demonstrably different from standard-bitrate recordings when no double-blind evidence that this is the case exists. that is what i mean by the scientific method. and in that particular area, you're actually not much better than the con artists who peddle audiophile cables, like monster.

until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav, your argument is utterly invalid. and your hostile reaction and your 'henchmen' quote actually demonstrates some weird, worrying paranoia regarding a cabal that doesn't actually exist.

your argument is now dead, elusive. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

  On 7/1/2011 at 5:15 AM, kaini said:

okay. let me lay it out as clearly as i can. you're petitioning on a forum that autechre probably read once a month if, in fact ever, for 24-bit rereleases of albums where there is no proof that a 24-bit original recording exists.

 

not only that, but you're pushing the fact that 24-bit recordings are demonstrably different from standard-bitrate recordings when no double-blind evidence that this is the case exists. that is what i mean by the scientific method. and in that particular area, you're actually not much better than the con artists who peddle audiophile cables, like monster.

 

until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav, your argument is utterly invalid. and your hostile reaction and your 'henchmen' quote actually demonstrates some weird, worrying paranoia regarding a cabal that doesn't actually exist.

 

your argument is now dead, elusive. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

my argument is dead when you fucking quote me on any of this bullshit of which you're attempting to communicate.

the original thread was a joke. you couldn't understand a troll if your mama gave birth to you under a bridge.

how many fucking times do i have to embaress you in front of your peers when i ask you to quote me.

QUOTE ME.

  On 7/1/2011 at 5:15 AM, kaini said:

 

until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav,

holy shit! this just went from "i bet you cant tell 320k mp3 from wav" to "you cant tell 16bit wav from 24bit wav" and now to "24bit to wav"

where the fuck are you getting this shit?

provide quotes?

who or what anywhere said they could tell the difference between 16bit wav and 24bit wav? quote it?

and now you say "until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav, "

WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN.

NOT ENOUGH TICKETS.

  On 7/1/2011 at 5:37 AM, elusive4 said:

  On 7/1/2011 at 5:15 AM, kaini said:

okay. let me lay it out as clearly as i can. you're petitioning on a forum that autechre probably read once a month if, in fact ever, for 24-bit rereleases of albums where there is no proof that a 24-bit original recording exists.

 

not only that, but you're pushing the fact that 24-bit recordings are demonstrably different from standard-bitrate recordings when no double-blind evidence that this is the case exists. that is what i mean by the scientific method. and in that particular area, you're actually not much better than the con artists who peddle audiophile cables, like monster.

 

until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav, your argument is utterly invalid. and your hostile reaction and your 'henchmen' quote actually demonstrates some weird, worrying paranoia regarding a cabal that doesn't actually exist.

 

your argument is now dead, elusive. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 

my argument is dead when you fucking quote me on any of this bullshit of which you're attempting to communicate.

the original thread was a joke. you couldn't understand a troll if your mama gave birth to you under a bridge.

 

how many fucking times do i have to embaress you in front of your peers when i ask you to quote me.

QUOTE ME.

 

  On 7/1/2011 at 5:15 AM, kaini said:

 

until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav,

 

holy shit! this just went from "i bet you cant tell 320k mp3 from wav" to "you cant tell 16bit wav from 24bit wav" and now to "24bit to wav"

 

where the fuck are you getting this shit?

provide quotes?

who or what anywhere said they could tell the difference between 16bit wav and 24bit wav? quote it?

and now you say "until you or someone else can demonstrate using an ABX test that 24-bit is distinguishable from wav, "

 

WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN.

 

NOT ENOUGH TICKETS.

 

until you change the title of the thread, your argument is dead. and even then, it's still dead. also, u mad.

and i repeat, extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence. the onus is on you here, not the rest of us.

  On 7/1/2011 at 6:04 AM, kaini said:

 

until you change the title of the thread, your argument is dead. and even then, it's still dead. also, u mad.

and i repeat, extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence. the onus is on you here, not the rest of us.

still dont see any quotes by myself that claim anything you wish to be stated?

kanini - you are rubbish and your peers dropped off once an outsider had determined that their balls had indeed been touched.

when will you disengage? how long will you keep this up? youre only making this harder on yourself and i will push you until the end.

so i ask - where are these so called quotes where i myself or anyone claims they can hear a difference between 16bit and 24bit wavs?

please quote so we can resolve this as quickly as possible and i can go back to laying pipe

  On 7/1/2011 at 6:04 AM, kaini said:

 

until you change the title of the thread, your argument is dead.

the title of the thread in no way states the claim that i can tell the difference between 16bit and 24bit wav.

you really need some kind of reading comprehension examination.

care to quote the thread title? for the class to see? your peers gave up long ago - it is only you who are still running with the ball.

watmm, you are as trolled as any lttl grrl second recess playground could imagine.

face it - kaini - your friends understood the troll long ago and left you to make an attempt to save face. they threw you under the bus and look at how far your reputation has been salvaged.

lol

this was fun but now it is a bit sad and i do not take pleasure in it , anymore. sorry for doing this to you in front of your peers, kaini. take care -

it's cool bro.

lol

i am being genuine when i say that i adore elusive4's writing style

"when will you disengage?"

i love it and look forward to future posts :]

my god what a thread

watmm hall of fshame material