Michelle Bachman is an evil cunt

[media='']http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iexoUIwrtgU&feature=youtu.be[/media]

also

The 10 Craziest Michele Bachmann Quotes

I could go on.

btw

NSFW

Your turn.

homophobes disgust me

i cant even begin to express my dislike of her. i won't even try, i'll get too angry.

this was my favourite bachmann moment

hiding in the bushes at a gay rights rally. why? who knows? who cares?

i think that was one of her first high-profile moments, too. the fact that she's a serious contender for the republican party right now is pretty telling.

  On 8/15/2011 at 8:33 AM, jefferoo said:

[media='']http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iexoUIwrtgU&feature=youtu.be[/media]

"It leads to the personal enslavement of individuals, because if you're involved in the christian fundamental lifestyle, it's bondage. It is personal bondage, personal despair, and personal enslavement, and that's why this is so dangerous. we need to have profound compassion for people who are dealing with the very real issue of spirital dysfunction in their life, and religious identity disorders."

slowclap.gif

Her husband, Marcus Bachmann runs a gay therapy clinic. De-gaying gay men. He is also a closet flaming homosexual.

damn david gregory actually being journalistic in this interview

I am hoping ron paul wins the gop candidacy, he is the most sane of the republican choices and he is more progressive with drug laws, foreign policy, and abuse of power (wiretapping) compared to obama. new perspectives are desperately needed in our current "democracy"

as much as i may agree, even discussing this woman gives her credibility that she does not deserve. she should be ignored just like the screaming bible thumper on the street corner.

  On 8/15/2011 at 9:31 AM, Al Hounos said:

as much as i may agree, even discussing this woman gives her credibility that she does not deserve. she should be ignored just like the screaming bible thumper on the street corner.

completely agree, if anything focusing on people like her and Sarah Palin will just make people throw their vote to Obama out of fear or hatred for Republicans, a way for them to forget about the battered wives syndrome they've had for the past 4 years

but seriously you want to talk the word evil, what do you call Obama whitehouse murdering civilians on a daily basis from videogame like drone aircraft?

As a Minnesotan, who's had to put up with her bullshit for years all i can say to the thread title is... well... no shit, huh?!

In regards to the title 'Michelle Bachman is an evil cunt', I'm not so sure. In the UK, we've somehow ended up with Cameron as PM, an Eton and Oxford educated, and one would assume, relatively intelligent man. When Cameron makes a decision, he knows exactly what he's doing, namely serving himself and the other extremely wealthy people of this country. He knows when he makes austerity cuts, puts money into funding private alternatives to the NHS, attempts to sell off national forests to landowners, supports Murdoch and his news empire etc etc. he's making decisions that will be detrimental to the majority of the population. That, to me, is evil.

Bachman on the other hand, as with Sarah Palin, just seems to have a shockingly low IQ. I'm wondering if she actually has the intelligence to be evil. In the UK, generally speaking, you have to be a bit more creative with your unpleasantness. An extrovertly homophobic or racist politician will rarely be taken seriously (although it is fairly obvious that some of them hold more 'traditional' views, if only behind closed doors). I would hope that someone that expresses such ridiculous opinions openly, as Bachman does, is too stupid to realise how idiotic she sounds. I say that with an optimistic view of the American people. Of course, if she were to become President, I would lose all faith in them and assume they were all as stupid as she is. I'm still trying to work out who actually voted Conservative in this country.

the most boring slut i've ever seen

dunno who this is but why is someone eating a big sausage deemed nsfw? the world's gone mad.

yeah this is all massively retarded.

the only question I have though.. what's the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality?

Never heard of her before but she does indeed seem like a stupid cunt.

  On 8/15/2011 at 2:08 PM, viscosity said:

what's the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality?

what's the fucking evolutionary purpose of mustard? what's the evolutionary purpose of snooker? what's the evolutinary purpose of your idiotic question?

lol

  On 8/15/2011 at 11:20 AM, Stoppit said:

In regards to the title 'Michelle Bachman is an evil cunt', I'm not so sure. In the UK, we've somehow ended up with Cameron as PM, an Eton and Oxford educated, and one would assume, relatively intelligent man. When Cameron makes a decision, he knows exactly what he's doing, namely serving himself and the other extremely wealthy people of this country. He knows when he makes austerity cuts, puts money into funding private alternatives to the NHS, attempts to sell off national forests to landowners, supports Murdoch and his news empire etc etc. he's making decisions that will be detrimental to the majority of the population. That, to me, is evil.

 

Bachman on the other hand, as with Sarah Palin, just seems to have a shockingly low IQ. I'm wondering if she actually has the intelligence to be evil. In the UK, generally speaking, you have to be a bit more creative with your unpleasantness. An extrovertly homophobic or racist politician will rarely be taken seriously (although it is fairly obvious that some of them hold more 'traditional' views, if only behind closed doors). I would hope that someone that expresses such ridiculous opinions openly, as Bachman does, is too stupid to realise how idiotic she sounds. I say that with an optimistic view of the American people. Of course, if she were to become President, I would lose all faith in them and assume they were all as stupid as she is. I'm still trying to work out who actually voted Conservative in this country.

Pretty much this. There are a lot of idiots in the U.S. who would support a candidate like this, but not enough for her to have a legit chance of being President (at least I hope so). The far right voters are a very vocal minority but a minority nonetheless.

  On 8/15/2011 at 2:57 PM, BCM said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 2:08 PM, viscosity said:

what's the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality?

 

 

what's the fucking evolutionary purpose of mustard? what's the evolutionary purpose of snooker? what's the evolutinary purpose of your idiotic question?

lol

not saying people can't do their thing.. but if reproduction serves to filter those who are most fit for survival, seems as though homos will need to be sperm doners or find a surrogate mother. question is valid if you consider it even partially a genetic trait

  On 8/15/2011 at 3:25 PM, viscosity said:

not saying people can't do their thing.. but if reproduction serves to filter those who are most fit for survival, seems as though homos will need to be sperm doners or find a surrogate mother. question is valid if you consider it even partially a genetic trait

I think his point was that evolution isn't some rigid dogma that everything falls in line with. There are many things going on in human life that don't have any perceived evolutionary purpose.

One of the best things about being human, rather than say, a slug, is our ability to break from the restrictions imposed by 'the selfish gene'. We are not controlled entirely by the need to pass on our genetic information. That's why we have art, science and Steven Seagal movies.

  On 8/15/2011 at 3:25 PM, viscosity said:

not saying people can't do their thing.. but if reproduction serves to filter those who are most fit for survival, seems as though homos will need to be sperm doners or find a surrogate mother. question is valid if you consider it even partially a genetic trait

humans have evolved well beyond the point of "filtering those fit for survival." medical science has made sure of that.

  On 8/15/2011 at 4:01 PM, disparaissant said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 3:25 PM, viscosity said:

not saying people can't do their thing.. but if reproduction serves to filter those who are most fit for survival, seems as though homos will need to be sperm doners or find a surrogate mother. question is valid if you consider it even partially a genetic trait

 

humans have evolved well beyond the point of "filtering those fit for survival." medical science has made sure of that.

well i was thinking more in the sense of people with down's or whatever that just would have been thrown down a well a few hundred years ago. but yeah.

also i mean the fact that i don't fuck men doesn't mean i don't want kids.

back on topic

http://www.theonion.com/articles/somebodys-got-to-save-this-country-from-certain-do,21135/

  Quote

Our country faces a moment of extreme crisis. We stand at the verge of an utter breakdown of our economy, our government, and our way of life. Democracy itself is at a crossroads, and without proper guidance, the United States of America will face grave times ahead. During this period of great tumult, someone needs to step in and fix these complex and enormous problems, and when it comes to the question of who is truly up to this task, I think we can all agree that person is—hands down and without question—me, Michele Bachmann.

Look at it logically for a minute. Of the 300 million people in the United States, who stands out as the one most capable of uniting a divided country and fixing a fractured Congress? Talk about a no-brainer. With my track record of urging white people to take back America, attending a church that believes the pope is the Antichrist, and advocating "conversion therapy" as a means to cure homosexuality, I'm clearly the only legitimate choice to become the next leader of the free world.

You know it and I know it.

It's just a plain and simple fact: When you close your eyes and think, "President of the United States of America," whose face immediately pops into your mind? Of course it's mine. After all, this is the face of a woman who instills confidence in the entire populace by having no understanding of basic American history and making a huge public outcry over a proposed change in lightbulbs.

We all know the outcome of this election is a foregone conclusion, and I personally wish we could just get it over with already so I could get to work abolishing the minimum wage and making sure public schools start teaching creationism.

Who, other than me, would you prefer to have leading high-level talks on the economy, or making the final decision as to whether or not the United States should invade another country? I certainly can't think of anyone else. Can you? Clearly, fixing the trade deficit, working with the president of China to foster a cordial, mutually beneficial relationship, and leading the strongest military on earth is what I was born to do. It's just so easy to picture me doing all those things. And while I admit there are some jobs I perhaps wouldn't be right for, I think we all agree what I can do is fix everything that is wrong with this country, all at once.

Let's look at the facts: I started my political career by praying on sidewalks and blocking women from entering abortion clinics. I have said on the floor of the House of Representatives that carbon dioxide is a "natural by- product of nature" and thus nothing to worry about. I've frequently misled voters about my family background, falsely claimed our health care system is the finest in the world, and suggested a McCarthy-esque witch hunt be conducted in order to root out members of Congress who are un-American.

If you weren't on board before reading those stellar credentials, do I even have to ask now? Just imagine a world in which I am the nation's 45th president. Doesn't that give you piece of mind and assurance that everything will finally be all right?

Washington, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Bachmann. Some things just make sense. Washington led this country to its independence. FDR guided the United States through the Great Depression and World War II. And I've suggested teachers could use The Lion King in their classrooms as an example of gay propaganda.

If anyone can bring dignity to the White House, I think we can unequivocally say it's me.

Picture it: It's late January, there's a joint session of Congress, and the House doorkeeper guy says the words, "Mr. Speaker, the president of the United States." Can you possibly conceive of anyone other than myself entering that chamber—the same place where Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed the country after Pearl Harbor—and delivering the State of the Union, a speech listened to by the entire global community? Could there be any better signal to the rest of the world that the United States is a country to be taken seriously? And is there really anyone else you would rather have standing behind a podium reserved for the planet's most powerful human being?

That's what I thought.