Fox News host crashes live on air

  On 7/28/2013 at 6:24 PM, soundwave said:

religion is for sheep

im pretty sure sheep are not smart enough to have religion.

I was excited for a smack down I don't think this was a smack down though.

riuchard dawkins tellsus that all religious pepole are evil so fucking slaughter tham all

riuchard dawkins tellsus that all religious pepole are evil so fucking slaughter tham all

I think it's kinda sad how some scientists involve themselves with religion. Dawkins reading "fanmail" is priceless though.

  Quote

 

poop

what a useless twat that host is... =/

  On 7/28/2013 at 3:10 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lkWngd2hZ4

to approach this subject in a dominantly intellectual manner or intellectually at all for that matter, is a mistake. spirituality is not intellectual, it is spiritual. these two on the screen are only making the fools of themselves; they are puffed up and quite brainwashed by the modern worlds interpretations and its dead words regarding false, churchy christianity and religion. this discussion has little or nothing to do with true, biblical spirituality. fox is churchy-bullshit-propaganda, designed to lead people further away from their true spiritual wisdom and lineage because the-powers-that-be know that if this wisdom was to take hold in the right way, there would be no power to be had and no money to be made.

  On 7/28/2013 at 6:24 PM, soundwave said:

religion is for sheep

Unfortunately these days, so is atheism and anti-religious sentiment.

Severe lack of tolerance on all sides IMO.

  On 7/28/2013 at 7:58 PM, Redruth said:

 

  On 7/28/2013 at 3:10 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lkWngd2hZ4

 

to approach this subject in a dominantly intellectual manner or intellectually at all for that matter, is a mistake. spirituality is not intellectual, it is spiritual. these two on the screen are only making the fools of themselves; they are puffed up and quite brainwashed by the modern worlds interpretations and its dead words regarding false, churchy christianity and religion. this discussion has little or nothing to do with true, biblical spirituality. fox is churchy-bullshit-propaganda, designed to lead people further away from their true spiritual wisdom and lineage because the-powers-that-be know that if this wisdom was to take hold in the right way, there would be no power to be had and no money to be made.

 

no one was talking about spirituality. If you think that scholars don't have a right to give a subject rigorous intellectual study just because it is vaguely related to "spirituality" to some people, than you need to take a looooong hard look in the mirror.

He comes across as an obnoxious cunt. Oh you've got a PhD? Really? Why not tell me again I haven't heard enough times already.

You'd guess for a guy that's supposedly so smart (I think he mentioned having a PhD) it should be easy to refute and counter the simple argument the host was confronting him with

what argument is that, exactly?

  On 7/28/2013 at 8:28 PM, Alcofribas said:

what argument is that, exactly?

Not sure if you could even call that an argument, but she seemed to think that a muslim can't or shouldn't write a book about christianity. All the writer could come up with was "but I'm a professor with a PhD"

exactly, i mean he wasn't born yesterday and he obviously had to know that fox news is supposed to be right wing, christian and stupid and their questions will also be right wing, christian and stupid-themed with an obvious agenda. instead of simply explaining why his background doesn't interfere with his research or how he deals with its interference he simply points at his "medals". this is just pointless r/justiceporn fodder.

how can a spanish guy reply to a post by Alcofribas? seriously, get real.

yeezus wept

This thread is becoming the video!

flol, this thread

  On 7/28/2013 at 8:20 PM, spratters said:

He comes across as an obnoxious cunt. Oh you've got a PhD? Really? Why not tell me again I haven't heard enough times already.

He's really just saying that because bitches keep questioning his authority as a scientist.

@redruth: it's historically and socially relevant, I don't see what's wrong with religion as a subject of study.

I'd like to see some credentials in this thread. seriously, you expect me to read these posts without a clear explanation as to how exactly your respective biases aren't discrediting your arguments?

je ne think so.

  On 7/28/2013 at 8:36 PM, eugene said:

exactly, i mean he wasn't born yesterday and he obviously had to know that fox news is supposed to be right wing, christian and stupid and their questions will also be right wing, christian and stupid-themed with an obvious agenda. instead of simply explaining why his background doesn't interfere with his research or how he deals with its interference he simply points at his "medals". this is just pointless r/justiceporn fodder.

I agree that he lays it on a bit thick with the PHD stuff but I would say is what he's doing is refusing to go the way Fox news wants him to go, i.e. becoming aggressive and argumentative.

By not going in that direction, remaining polite and continuing to come from an angle of reason he's frustrating the hell out of them as they want him to follow their programmed 'provoke and then shout down' pattern.

Yeah that dude won me over with that interview. That's how anyone should handle such a situation.

as if "winning" in a fox news argument takes any actual intellectual or emotional effort.

It's not about 'winning' eugene. And the fact that you don't understand this speaks volumes.

that's why its in inverted commas, i think you know what i mean and we're talking about the same thing.