Jump to content
IGNORED

The Caustic Window LP (CAT023) Kickstarter FAQ - LIVE NOW!


Recommended Posts

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

An IDM wiki would be great. There's soooo so many tidbits of interesting info scattered through this site... I don't want to be the one rescuing them from 10 year old threads tho

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:04 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

 

 

Should throw up a WATMM Wikia setup or something simple like that. Most featured artists have already been fleshed out and you'd just need a few contributors to round it out.

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:04 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

 

 

Sweet!!! Looking forward to that! Us catalog/discography geeks will have a cow :D

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:04 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

 

That would be great!

 

So yeah: Since the CW LP seemed like a pretty straight forward rip process that happened last Friday can you clarify what is still going on this week that is holding up the release?

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:40 PM, ypc1200 said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:04 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

 

That would be great!

 

So yeah: Since the CW LP seemed like a pretty straight forward rip process that happened last Friday can you clarify what is still going on this week that is holding up the release?

 

maybe they found out that CW LP is utter shit after a single listen that they dont dare to release it? Maybe right now they try to fix the problem paying people back there filthy lucres ? ;-) ;-)

Edited by Staadrengen
  On 6/12/2014 at 8:40 PM, ypc1200 said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:04 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:38 PM, Lane Visitor said:

why isn't there an Aphex Twin wiki? like a super in depth discography (incl live shows/bootlegs that exist, outtakes, comps, remixes, etc etc)... with ability to comment and discuss on these releases? it'd be an awesome reference.

 

Wonder if we could create something like that at WATMM, and have that function as a subpage?

That's what WATMM had, when it had a site proper attached to it... I'm... working on it :rolleyes:

 

That would be great!

 

So yeah: Since the CW LP seemed like a pretty straight forward rip process that happened last Friday can you clarify what is still going on this week that is holding up the release?

 

I would imagine that it may be to do with sorting out the final distribution of the files. of course, whatever server will be hosting the content will get battered to fuck upon release, so it needs to be a service that can stand up to the demand.

 

I would hope that Joyrex hasn't chosen Bleep to host the files...

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:47 PM, oscillik said:

I would imagine that it may be to do with sorting out the final distribution of the files. of course, whatever server will be hosting the content will get battered to fuck upon release, so it needs to be a service that can stand up to the demand.

 

I would hope that Joyrex hasn't chosen Bleep to host the files...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading that it might be done through a Bandcamp page? That was a while ago and maybe just an idea, though. If it's not Bandcamp, I'm with you in hoping that whenever server the files are being hosted on will be up to snuff for handling the traffic it'll get on release day.

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:02 PM, miim said:

I wouldn't be surprised if we got ab5 bundled!

As you all ofcourse know ; a pretty god rip og AB5 can be found at dimeadozen.

 

AFX (aka Aphex Twin)

Analogue Bubblebath 5

Rephlex CAT034EP (Vinyl Test Pressing Only)

1995

 

Lineage: CDR(1) > EAC > WAV > FLAC 1.1.0 -8

Source: Unreleased Vinyl Test Pressing

 

File Size: 233mb (flac -8)

 

 

I hope for something never heard before as bonus.

Edited by Staadrengen
Guest jasondonervan
  On 6/12/2014 at 8:47 PM, oscillik said:

I would imagine that it may be to do with sorting out the final distribution of the files. of course, whatever server will be hosting the content will get battered to fuck upon release, so it needs to be a service that can stand up to the demand.

 

I would hope that Joyrex hasn't chosen Bleep to host the files...

 

iy7FtHKw9Bo3n.jpg

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:23 PM, jasondonervan said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 8:47 PM, oscillik said:

I would imagine that it may be to do with sorting out the final distribution of the files. of course, whatever server will be hosting the content will get battered to fuck upon release, so it needs to be a service that can stand up to the demand.

 

I would hope that Joyrex hasn't chosen Bleep to host the files...

 

iy7FtHKw9Bo3n.jpg

 

No, Bleep is not hosting them.

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:21 PM, Staadrengen said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 7:02 PM, miim said:

I wouldn't be surprised if we got ab5 bundled!

As you all ofcourse know ; a pretty god rip og AB5 can be found at dimeadozen.

 

AFX (aka Aphex Twin)

Analogue Bubblebath 5

Rephlex CAT034EP (Vinyl Test Pressing Only)

1995

 

Lineage: CDR(1) > EAC > WAV > FLAC 1.1.0 -8

Source: Unreleased Vinyl Test Pressing

 

File Size: 233mb (flac -8)

 

 

I hope for something never heard before as bonus.

 

LOL @ the "lineage" - CDr as source? so if it went vinyl to CDr, that means the audio was capped at 16-bit/14400, right? Then, reduced again by FLAC conversion? Wouldn't that make it less than stellar (I personally don't care THAT much about audio fidelity, but some here do)?

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:29 PM, Joyrex said:

LOL @ the "lineage" - CDr as source? so if it went vinyl to CDr, that means the audio was capped at 16-bit/14400, right? Then, reduced again by FLAC conversion? Wouldn't that make it less than stellar (I personally don't care THAT much about audio fidelity, but some here do)?

If it went straight from vinyl to CD-R, that suggests to me that someone used one of those shitty all-in-one Crosleys or whatever that let you burn a disc straight from a rip. Obviously the popular AB5 rip does not sound bad at all, so I suspect this lineage is erroneous. At any rate, even if a CD-R was involved at some point, the files are 16-bit/44.1kHz anyway, so nothing would have been lost there.

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:34 PM, KyonPalm said:

 

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:29 PM, Joyrex said:

LOL @ the "lineage" - CDr as source? so if it went vinyl to CDr, that means the audio was capped at 16-bit/14400, right? Then, reduced again by FLAC conversion? Wouldn't that make it less than stellar (I personally don't care THAT much about audio fidelity, but some here do)?

If it went straight from vinyl to CD-R, that suggests to me that someone used one of those shitty all-in-one Crosleys or whatever that let you burn a disc straight from a rip. Obviously the popular AB5 rip does not sound bad at all, so I suspect this lineage is erroneous. At any rate, even if a CD-R was involved at some point, the files are 16-bit/44.1kHz anyway, so nothing would have been lost there.

 

Ah, I see - yeah, it doesn't sound bad, but still wondering.

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

so any word yet if the chosen lord has put his sigil of approvement on the digital rip, joyrex?

you don't seem 2 deny there will be bonus material, do you :emotawesomepm9:

 

soooon!!!!!

  On 2/26/2015 at 9:39 AM, RupturedSouls said:

This drugs makes me feel like I'm on song!

  On 9/1/2014 at 5:50 PM, StephenG said:

I'm hardly a closed minded nun. Remember, I'm on a fucking IDM forum.... an IDM forum.. Think about that for a second before claiming people are closed minded nuns.

  On 6/12/2014 at 9:36 PM, Joyrex said:
Ah, I see - yeah, it doesn't sound bad, but still wondering.

I'd be far more worried about what equipment s/he used to rip the disc with (what turntable/preamp, audio-in settings, post-processing, etc.). The technical specifications don't matter to my ears because if you can tell a difference past about 256kbps and 44.1kHz you're already inhuman (most people have a hearing range of up to around 20kHz). I'm just an autistic archivist, so my interest in quality only runs as far as statistic data. My ears don't care as long as it's at least 192kbps.

  On 4/9/2014 at 5:17 PM, pafr said:

I guess who the fuck am I to judge who's rich and who's not eh? lol

So who is rich and who is poor? I cannot say.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×