Jump to content
IGNORED

WAP381 - MARCHROMT30A EDIT 2B 96


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 650
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, should give it time to get used to. I think if this version had come out initially, the slower one would probably feel a bit weird also :)

Oh wow, this worked out really great! Really don't hear a lot of new elements yet, if any, but I'm very OK with this version.

I LOVE this new faster mix. People who are saying it is the exact same track sped up need to take a second listen. This mix is chock full of new sounds. I'm a little shocked anyone who was familiar with the original wouldn't notice.
I'm also really looking forward to slowing this version down on my turntable when my 12" shows up!

  On 3/13/2015 at 3:14 PM, omnii said:

I LOVE this new faster mix. People who are saying it is the exact same track sped up need to take a second listen. This mix is chock full of new sounds. I'm a little shocked anyone who was familiar with the original wouldn't notice.

I'm also really looking forward to slowing this version down on my turntable when my 12" shows up!

 

Agreed. There are plenty of differences.

 

For the first half it felt weird to me, but by the end this mix had definitely won me over.

Gotta go fast.. Wonder what it sounds like at the speed of the "original"

 

Edit: And yeah, there's lots of edits in there, I really like it. Little bit less spaced out but great for spazzing out (in a good way)

Edited by chronical
  On 3/13/2015 at 3:38 AM, Consul said:

MARCHROMT38 fast @ 01:07:23

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b054pdx2

 

 

It's fun, but the original tempo is the right one. I still preordered the shit out of that shit and am very happy I did.

I like it. It's a unique track at any speed, but seems even more so sped up. I'd be interested to hear what someone who has never heard it at regular speed would think. I wonder if I can train my brain to think the fast tempo is the "normal" one?

I like the new version, it feels much better. The original is like what you get when you slow down a beat fuckery druqks track. You can appreciate the details much more, but it's just... not as good.

yeah the new version reminds me of windowlicker and the tuss but its much further developed

Edited by o00o
  On 3/13/2015 at 9:49 AM, psn said:

 

  On 3/13/2015 at 6:50 AM, jchgf said:

2 fast 2 noodly

prefer the orig

 

Yeah, the original was pretty much perfect.

 

 

I agree with these gentlemen.

 

I hope the changes we hear on the alternate XMAS_EVE are less subtle and a little more (contour regard)isn in terms of difference. Still happy to see MARCHROMT30A get the single treatment. It definitely deserved it imo.

Well it's named XMAS_EVE1 N on this vs XMAS_EVE10 on Syro so it could be an earlier version. Or, there are a lot of distinctive sections to that song so it'd be cool if the N means it's an extension to the end part of the song (~8:35) when those weird drums(what are those?) fully come in.

 

  On 1/19/2020 at 5:27 PM, Richie Sombrero said:

Nah, you're a wee child who can't wait for official release. Embarrassing. Shove your privilege. 

  On 9/2/2014 at 12:37 AM, Ivan Ooze said:

don't be a cockroach prolapsing nun bulkV

  On 3/13/2015 at 8:06 PM, Jobe said:

I like it. It's a unique track at any speed, but seems even more so sped up. I'd be interested to hear what someone who has never heard it at regular speed would think.

My initial thoughts exactly. The speed change made an already alien track sound even more alien, yrt accessible? If that makes sense... the way it's mixed in is very well done too. I imagine all the newbs who were listening in got their minds collectively blown, and rightfully so

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×