Now That Trump's President... (not any more!)

so eventually we'll have no regulations. nice! free market here we cummmmmmm

Trump's pick for the supreme court will be announced tonight @ 8pm EST. This is gonna be goooooood...

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:04 PM, olo said:

Trump's pick for the supreme court will be announced tonight @ 8pm EST. This is gonna be goooooood...

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:05 PM, auxien said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:04 PM, olo said:

Trump's pick for the supreme court will be announced tonight @ 8pm EST. This is gonna be goooooood...

Reality TV! But real reality that will have an impact on abortion rights, gay marriage, and millions of other causes, can't wait to see who's gonna fuck up our world/get kicked in the balls by RBG.

 

well he stated this a few days ago...pins & needles

  Quote

"I think the person I pick will be big, big," Trump said, according to a partial transcript of a Christian Broadcasting Network interview set to air in full on Sunday. "I think evangelicals, Christians will love my pick."

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 4:56 PM, olo said:

lol?

 

Trump signs executive order requiring that for every one new regulation, two must be revoked

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-requiring-that-for-every-one-new-regulation-two-must-be-revoked-234365

that was actually something he promised to do before he became president.

oh btw: check out this gossip: https://bgr.com/2017/01/30/donald-trump-vs-white-house-rogues/

that's something that i didn't quite get, wasn't obamba supposed to appoint his own guy after that scallops judge died? how come it didn't happen? i remember reading that he had all the legal authority to do so despite cries and moans of republicans.

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:09 PM, eugene said:

that's something that i didn't quite get, wasn't obamba supposed to appoint his own guy after that scallops judge died? how come it didn't happen? i remember reading that he had all the legal authority to do so despite cries and moans of republicans.

Republicans shot Garland down player. Took him out back and put two in him.

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:07 PM, Nebraska said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 4:56 PM, olo said:

lol?

 

Trump signs executive order requiring that for every one new regulation, two must be revoked

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-requiring-that-for-every-one-new-regulation-two-must-be-revoked-234365

 

that was actually something he promised to do before he became president.

 

oh btw: check out this gossip: https://bgr.com/2017/01/30/donald-trump-vs-white-house-rogues/

 

Christ, those rogue tweets, fucked up if even 1/4 true

lol

bummer, and now a few more geriatric judges are at risk of hitting the bucket during trump's reign...

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:59 PM, Bob Dobalina said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:07 PM, Nebraska said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 4:56 PM, olo said:

lol?

 

Trump signs executive order requiring that for every one new regulation, two must be revoked

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-requiring-that-for-every-one-new-regulation-two-must-be-revoked-234365

 

that was actually something he promised to do before he became president.

 

oh btw: check out this gossip: https://bgr.com/2017/01/30/donald-trump-vs-white-house-rogues/

 

 

Christ, those rogue tweets, fucked up if even 1/4 true

 

I like the photoshop one. Going back to the touched up hand posts...

They're hilariously terrifying, but not sure if I can buy these are legitimate accounts of #POTUS. 

lol

col

some of the tid bits are so petty and specific that they feel like they ring true.

Also just tweeted that anti-LGBT EO coming this week.

Liverpool demonstration tonight, as a reaction to the Executive Order on immigration and the UK governments quiet

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:12 PM, olo said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:09 PM, eugene said:

that's something that i didn't quite get, wasn't obamba supposed to appoint his own guy after that scallops judge died? how come it didn't happen? i remember reading that he had all the legal authority to do so despite cries and moans of republicans.

 

Republicans shot Garland down player. Took him out back and put two in him.

 

i also remember mitch mcconnell saying something along the lines of it didn't matter who obama picked for supreme court because they were going to block all his suggestions.

  On 1/30/2017 at 9:06 PM, olo said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:59 PM, Bob Dobalina said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 8:07 PM, Nebraska said:

 

  On 1/30/2017 at 4:56 PM, olo said:

lol?

 

Trump signs executive order requiring that for every one new regulation, two must be revoked

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-requiring-that-for-every-one-new-regulation-two-must-be-revoked-234365

 

that was actually something he promised to do before he became president.

 

oh btw: check out this gossip: https://bgr.com/2017/01/30/donald-trump-vs-white-house-rogues/

 

 

Christ, those rogue tweets, fucked up if even 1/4 true

 

 

I like the photoshop one. Going back to the touched up hand posts...

They're hilariously terrifying, but not sure if I can buy these are legitimate accounts of #POTUS. 

 

yeah it's impossible to verify, but we'll see whether any of their predictions happen like this one: https://twitter.com/RoguePOTUSStaff/status/826153579991937026

xenophobic French-Canadian storms into a mosque and kills Muslims after Trudeau expresses Canada's inclusive position on immigration in response to Trump's antics. ding ding, let that register.

edit: The Australian, a smug conservative paper of choice by most in our current government, ran headlines on this event, which surprised me, especially when they clearly referred to it as a "terrorist" attack (cos we all know that word is reserved for specific actions by specific people). I thought "oh, they had a rare moment of honesty".

of course this fleeting assurance vanished when I read a bit further and realised they were spinning it as an attack by Muslim extremists on Muslims, before it turned out to be some white college edgelord, and complete with unverified remarks about the attacker(s) yelling Aloha Snackbar before opening fire. of course... the immigration ban is justified, don't you see? it protects Muslims.

chris hayes sean trende thread on twitter: ban designed to be struck down by courts and vociferously opposed by political opponents so that those elements can be crushed when next (and statistically highly likely) attack comes. of course that likelihood  is higher given their general incompetence, and racist posturing.

At work I'm practically the only one who didn't vote for trump. There are only 5 of us who work here (4 now since one was fired). Funny how you couldn't shut them up leading up to the inauguration. It's been crickets here at work since all the executive orders. One finally broke down today and voiced her disapproval of how he's doing things.

  On 1/31/2017 at 1:38 AM, usagi said:

xenophobic French-Canadian storms into a mosque and kills Muslims after Trudeau expresses Canada's inclusive position on immigration in response to Trump's antics. ding ding, let that register.

 

edit: The Australian, a smug conservative paper of choice by most in our current government, ran headlines on this event, which surprised me, especially when they clearly referred to it as a "terrorist" attack (cos we all know that word is reserved for specific actions by specific people). I thought "oh, they had a rare moment of honesty".

 

of course this fleeting assurance vanished when I read a bit further and realised they were spinning it as an attack by Muslim extremists on Muslims, complete with unverified remarks about how the attacker(s) yelled Aloha Snackbar before opening fire. of course... the immigration ban is justified, don't you see? it protects Muslims.

All of our newspapers are referring to it as a terrorist attack. They have been very clear that it was a french Canadian as well.

Edit: just saying it doesn't look like our media has the same shitty agenda, which is nice. Community response so far has been very positive as well. It's basically being universally condemned, as it should be.

Editeditedit: but I see now he hasn't yet been charged with terrorism related charges, which is horseshit IMO. Says investigation pending but yeah.

now The Australian has published a different angle on the story online in light of facts about the shooter. this one doesn't lead with a clear framing of this event as a terrorist attack but rather points to the Canadian authorities intentions to charge the perpetrator as a terrorist. dat objectiveness/neutrality.

jazband

lol