Jump to content
IGNORED

Now That Trump's President... (not any more!)


Recommended Posts

Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father 

 

TL:DR version of the article:

The Trumps’ tax maneuvers show a pattern of deception, tax experts say

Donald Trump began reaping wealth from his father’s real estate empire as a toddler

That ‘small loan’ of $1 million was actually at least $60.7 million — much of it never repaid

Fred Trump wove a safety net that rescued his son from one bad bet after another

The Trumps turned an $11 million loan debt into a legally questionable tax write-off

Father and son set out to create the myth of a self-made billionaire

Donald Trump tried to change his ailing father’s will, setting off a family reckoning

The Trumps created a company that siphoned cash from the empire

The Trump parents dodged hundreds of millions in gift taxes by grossly undervaluing the assets they would pass on

After Fred Trump’s death, his empire’s most valuable asset was an I.O.U. from Donald Trump

Donald Trump got a windfall when the empire was sold. But he may have left money on the table.

 

New York state tax department reviewing fraud allegations involving Trump in NYT article

Trumps business is being destroyed. But his political power is something else, I'm afraid. And Populism will be his new business. (thanks bannon!) :(

Showtime doc on the trump tax story.

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/409595-showtime-to-air-documentary-on-nyt-trump-investigation

 

I agree about his new business being populism and outright theft/money laundering etc via political power of the presidency. He’s enriching himself and his family in numerous ways even if his trump brand is being tarnished

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Releases

Sample LIbraries

instagram

Cascade Data 

Mastodon

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 10/3/2018 at 1:14 PM, ignatius said:

Showtime doc on the trump tax story.

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/409595-showtime-to-air-documentary-on-nyt-trump-investigation

 

I agree about his new business being populism and outright theft/money laundering etc via political power of the presidency. He’s enriching himself and his family in numerous ways even if his trump brand is being tarnished

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Most of/all of which is subject to asset forfeiture. 

  On 10/3/2018 at 8:50 PM, QBLA said:

This was pretty much my reaction to the presidential alert today.

 

I didn't actually get one. Not sure whether to be grateful that I'm not on that list, or worried that I am on some other list...

When I was a freshman at university I got a job at some vegetarian takeout in the commons of the library. It was run by a 5 foot smug little weirdo with a slimy ponytail almost as long as him.  

Yeah, so I addressed this fellow employee, a college girl, as woman. Like, what's up woman!

 

I got a call in my dorm room from slimy ponytail guy to either apologize to her for saying woman or quit.

Let's assume for the sake of argument the guy is innocent of what he's claiming to have done, and he's just a frat boy in self denial. I just don't see how a fbi investigation could help him at all. The only thing the investigation could do is gather more and more anecdotal evidence from classmates that he drank a lot and was a party animal, it can't absolve him of having done the act or not. I don't even know what that would look like when there's no direct evidence of the act. So I can understand why he doesn't want one. 

He REALLY shot himself in the foot not admitting to the whole boofing and partying too hard thing. The conversation shifted from the sexual assault accusation to proving he's not worthy of the supreme court due to his inability to admit what is obviously happening. A smart move on democrats part.

Imagine he did tell the truth about the partying thing, he'd still be known as the next Cosby, regardless of whether he did it or not. Which I am willing to bet he did due to Ford's testimony and just the feeling of the case, but even I have to admit that the evidence is only anecdotal so far and as I said based off of gut feeling due to circumstances. An Impassioned he said/ she said. Unless I missed something.

I wonder why they haven't focused on the other accusers. That's when it became obvious Cosby was a monster.


 

Good chance it will be forgotten like Anita hill. 

All I remember is pubic hair on coke can.

 

I guess we are just stalling until midterms? 

 

 

I still don't understand how they blocked Merrick Garland.

Edited by marf

Yeah there is this general feeling that Democrats are just doing this to stall unfortunately. It feels like politics is getting in the way of any actual justice. Republicans just want it to go away and I can't help but feel that democrat politicians are just.. using her/this situation and they just so happen to be on the right side of the fence (Anthony Weiner comes to mind). You know? I'm not saying that's true, it's just the feeling. It feels like a chess move, not about actual justice and due diligence.

Week long investigation  :facepalm: . Somehow Hillary's emails were more important than a supreme court nominee who potentially has raped several women. 

Edited by Brisbot

Assuming he passes through he's going to be quite the bastard of SCOTUS - there's no way he'll be able shake this off reputation wise. I don't mean that in the sense of this faux claim of "character assassination" succeeding but in regards to his tone and lack of professionalism and tact. He is perpetually going to be asked to recuse himself because of his refusal to given sworn testimony. A slim GOP majority and slick maneuvering will not quell the fact that the National Committee of Churches, the American Bar Association oppose his nomination, or that he is historically one of the least popular appointees in history.

 

1991 was very different. The Bush administration appointed a well respected black conservative accused of harassment, not a judge accused of sexual assault who was hand-picked to be most soft on a hypothetical impeachment. Anita Hill did not get justice in terms of blocking Thomas appointment or being given respect at the time but it started the ball rolling in terms of actually acknowledging and addressing sexual harassment. These allegations in 2018 involve sexual assault, perjury, and a hyper-partisan effort to forcefully shift the Supreme Court to a conservative majority for the first time in 75 years. 

Edited by joshuatx
  On 10/4/2018 at 12:13 PM, marf said:

Good chance it will be forgotten like Anita hill.

All I remember is pubic hair on coke can.

 

I guess we are just stalling until midterms?

 

 

I still don't understand how they blocked Merrick Garland.

Long Dong Silver

Positive Metal Attitude

  On 10/4/2018 at 6:18 PM, Rubin Farr said:

 

  On 10/4/2018 at 12:13 PM, marf said:

Good chance it will be forgotten like Anita hill.

All I remember is pubic hair on coke can.

 

I guess we are just stalling until midterms?

 

 

I still don't understand how they blocked Merrick Garland.

Long Dong Silver

Lol. What if Bart shows Ruth Bäder Ginsberg some big dick porn?

Is it any wonder a judge would be a power hungry asshole? Ever stand in front of one? One faux pas and you are in chains. 

  On 10/4/2018 at 11:24 PM, marf said:

Is it any wonder a judge would be a power hungry asshole? Ever stand in front of one? One faux pas and you are in chains.

Maybe it's different in the UK but I did jury service last year and the judges seemed safe as fuck. Fair and even handed despite one of the defendants being a mouthy cunt (we found him innocent in the end but he really didn't do himself any favours)

Yeah I also did jury duty last year. I wasn’t looking forward to it, but I left really impressed and strangely patriotic.

The current season of Serial is documenting a courthouse and going pretty in depth in regards to specific judge(s?), the courts in that city in particular, and the implications for the rest of America with it. If you want to hear examples of a judge being an asshole, I think it was episode two or three.

Well, Heitkamp is a no. I'm really hoping Ben Sasse gives a surprise fuck off to the GOP.

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

For the first time since 1987, The Washington Post's Editorial Board is telling senators to vote "no" on a Supreme Court nominee.


 

The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh - Signed, 2,400+ Law Professors


 

Evan McMullin, ormer independent presidential candidate, CIA operations officer & House GOP policy director: "He’s since been credibly accused of abuse, misled the Senate and proven to be a contemptuous partisan. We must maintain a higher standard for our highest court."


 

Retired #SCOTUS Justice John Paul Stevens on Judge #Kavanaugh: “I’ve changed my views for reasons that have no really relationship to his intellectual ability or his record as a federal judge…I think that his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind.”


 

We were Brett Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies. We don’t think he should be confirmed.


 

Yale roommate says Kavanaugh lied under oath about drinking and yearbook


 


National Council of Churches calls for Kavanaugh's nomination to be withdrawn


This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×