Hooper Bay!?

I dont even have anything to say about that, you know

  Demerzel said:

I dont even have anything to say about that, you know

What?

Can I join in this non-discussion then and add nothing? Seems the thing to do.

  fox said:

Can I join in this non-discussion then and add nothing? Seems the thing to do.

Certainly.

BTW are you also G.I. Joe on the PC Format forum or is it just some other berk using the same ugly mug for an avatar

no

  fox said:

no

Then who the Hell is this dood?

http://forum.pcformat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=52790

  fox said:

no

Then who the Hell is this dood?

http://forum.pcformat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=52790

He's fucking Karl Pilkington, aka Pilky1, aka the man would eat a knob at night.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Pilkington

  Dogboy73 said:

  Joyrex said:

The pre-Twoism stuff does exist; I've spoken to owners of said releases and I happen to own a BoC Maxima cassette.

Most of the BoC maxima stuff has been heard. Nothing from the early 'releases' has (Hooper Bay, Acid Memories etc..) What your saying about speaking to owners that claim to own that stuff doesn't mean jack s**t does it! It's still never actually been heard. We've just heard about people that reckon they have heard it!!

 

With the demand for BoC stuff it would have found it's way onto the net even if they had just given a bunch of tapes to close friends who then each flushed them down the bog! If it exists it would be out there. It's not so it doesn't & I won't believe oterwise until we hear something official from BoC or WARP. Nothing less than a proper release will rebut this view. It's just riduculous after all these years.

ps nobody gives a shit about your opinions, if you're looking for a serious place to discuss serious BOC related opinions, http://barneum.com/twoism/

  Odd NotsraM said:

WHAT POSSIBLE FUCKING REASON WOULD BOC HAVE TO FAKE A BACK CATALOGUE?!

 

ps nobody gives a shit about your opinions, if you're looking for a serious place to discuss serious BOC related opinions, http://barneum.com/twoism/

lol

  Odd NotsraM said:

WHAT POSSIBLE FUCKING REASON WOULD BOC HAVE TO FAKE A BACK CATALOGUE?!

 

ps nobody gives a shit about your opinions.

I don't know. Does sound daft when you put it like that (i.e. faking the back catalogue)! But that still doesn't explain why we've not seen any concrete evidence of their existence. Some of the tracks that have been backed up with official WARP play are not ones that appear on the 'back catalogue' releases. Therefore I think my opionions are quite valid as things stand.

The other possibility is that those early releases do actually exist. But they are so un BoC like that if they were leaked nobody would credit them as the real deal. This is because of our expectations of any BoC material no matter how old or obscure. I think we're all expecting that familiar BoC sound. But it could be that the early stuff from the back catalogue is some way off of those expectations.

  Dogboy73 said:

The other possibility is that those early releases do actually exist. But they are so un BoC like that if they were leaked nobody would credit them as the real deal. This is because of our expectations of any BoC material no matter how old or obscure. I think we're all expecting that familiar BoC sound. But it could be that the early stuff from the back catalogue is some way off of those expectations.

But that makes it all the more interesting..

On the one hand the sound could be nothing like we might expect..

But then i sometimes wonder if any of those live tracks are from the early releases..?

You know the ones with chopped up vocals etc.. :angry:

Now that would be awesome.!

It could go either way..!

I don't think there's THAT much difference...

I mean, "Duffy" is 100% BoC-ish and that's from their second release.

  soup said:

I don't think there's THAT much difference...

 

I mean, "Duffy" is 100% BoC-ish and that's from their second release.

yes i agree..

but then there is 'wouldnt you like to be free..?'

is that considered to be 100% BoC-ish ?

I'm sure there is a good enough reason that it's not released. "They only wanted their friends and relatives to hear it," is what they said, so who cares?

  audiotrack said:

  soup said:

I don't think there's THAT much difference...

 

I mean, "Duffy" is 100% BoC-ish and that's from their second release.

yes i agree..

but then there is 'wouldnt you like to be free..?'

is that considered to be 100% BoC-ish ?

Well, we have only heard 50 seconds of it.

  soup said:

  audiotrack said:

  soup said:

I don't think there's THAT much difference...

 

I mean, "Duffy" is 100% BoC-ish and that's from their second release.

yes i agree..

but then there is 'wouldnt you like to be free..?'

is that considered to be 100% BoC-ish ?

Well, we have only heard 50 seconds of it.

Well, we have only heard 25 seconds of duffy.

  Dogboy73 said:

  Odd NotsraM said:

WHAT POSSIBLE FUCKING REASON WOULD BOC HAVE TO FAKE A BACK CATALOGUE?!

 

ps nobody gives a shit about your opinions.

I don't know. Does sound daft when you put it like that (i.e. faking the back catalogue)! But that still doesn't explain why we've not seen any concrete evidence of their existence. Some of the tracks that have been backed up with official WARP play are not ones that appear on the 'back catalogue' releases. Therefore I think my opionions are quite valid as things stand.

 

The other possibility is that those early releases do actually exist. But they are so un BoC like that if they were leaked nobody would credit them as the real deal. This is because of our expectations of any BoC material no matter how old or obscure. I think we're all expecting that familiar BoC sound. But it could be that the early stuff from the back catalogue is some way off of those expectations.

  audiotrack said:

  soup said:

  audiotrack said:

  soup said:

I don't think there's THAT much difference...

 

I mean, "Duffy" is 100% BoC-ish and that's from their second release.

yes i agree..

but then there is 'wouldnt you like to be free..?'

is that considered to be 100% BoC-ish ?

Well, we have only heard 50 seconds of it.

Well, we have only heard 25 seconds of duffy.

True, but maybe "Wouldn't You Like To Be Free?" turns more BoC-ish later in the song.

Or that track's an exception.

  Odd NotsraM said:

  Dogboy73 said:

  Odd NotsraM said:

WHAT POSSIBLE FUCKING REASON WOULD BOC HAVE TO FAKE A BACK CATALOGUE?!

 

ps nobody gives a shit about your opinions.

I don't know. Does sound daft when you put it like that (i.e. faking the back catalogue)! But that still doesn't explain why we've not seen any concrete evidence of their existence. Some of the tracks that have been backed up with official WARP play are not ones that appear on the 'back catalogue' releases. Therefore I think my opionions are quite valid as things stand.

 

The other possibility is that those early releases do actually exist. But they are so un BoC like that if they were leaked nobody would credit them as the real deal. This is because of our expectations of any BoC material no matter how old or obscure. I think we're all expecting that familiar BoC sound. But it could be that the early stuff from the back catalogue is some way off of those expectations.

 

You are vastly misinformed. Please cease conversation.

Just reporting things as I see them. All this bullshit about, 'i know someone, who knows someone, who had a tape of early BoC stuff'! It's ridiculous! So we've heard 25/30 seconds of a couple of tracks that are supposed to be from the early releases? How the fuck do we know they really are from the early releases?! Have we heard anything official? If not then on who's authority do we have it this material is genuine?

Misinformed? How about a bit of common bloody sense here? It's like the Da Vinci Code with BoC tracks instead of Marry Magdalene! A lot of people are getting far to wrapped up in this Holy Grail like quest for lost BoC tracks!

  Dogboy73 said:

A lot of people are getting far to wrapped up in this Holy Grail like quest for lost BoC tracks!

Old Tunes were just as rare.

  soup said:

  Dogboy73 said:

A lot of people are getting far to wrapped up in this Holy Grail like quest for lost BoC tracks!

Old Tunes were just as rare.

Yeah but the 'old tunes' stuff is out there. The early back catalogue stuff isn't ...... unless it is but the names are different! Who knows. No seriously. WHO KNOWS?! BoC know & they are the only 2 people that can say for sure as far as I'm concerend. Certainly not what-his-face who is apparently part of Hexagon Sun or whatever?! Get real people!

  Dogboy73 said:

So we've heard 25/30 seconds of a couple of tracks that are supposed to be from the early releases? How the fuck do we know they really are from the early releases?! Have we heard anything official? If not then on who's authority do we have it this material is genuine?

Because they were on the official BoC website you donkey. That's how we know that they're genuine.

  Dogboy73 said:

  soup said:

  Dogboy73 said:

A lot of people are getting far to wrapped up in this Holy Grail like quest for lost BoC tracks!

Old Tunes were just as rare.

Yeah but the 'old tunes' stuff is out there. The early back catalogue stuff isn't ...... unless it is but the names are different! Who knows. No seriously. WHO KNOWS?! BoC know & they are the only 2 people that can say for sure as far as I'm concerend. Certainly not what-his-face who is apparently part of Hexagon Sun or whatever?! Get real people!

There's 100 copies of them. Max. 200.

What the hell do you expect!?

  mcbpete said:

  Dogboy73 said:

So we've heard 25/30 seconds of a couple of tracks that are supposed to be from the early releases? How the fuck do we know they really are from the early releases?! Have we heard anything official? If not then on who's authority do we have it this material is genuine?

Because they were on the official BoC website you donkey. That's how we know that they're genuine.

There not there now ........ they've been taking down because they never really existed :fee: