stupid first world problems you're dealing with

Shoot it down, put it in the microwave, see if it pops.

Some mod on an electronic music forum I occasionally peruse took it upon himself to rename a living legend thread in a way only he is amused by.

indietorrents wtf

quiet*

discogs, have ur search bar fixed in place already jeesus

  On 10/20/2015 at 2:10 PM, vincentvc said:

discogs, have ur search bar fixed in place already jeesus

Do not search Discogs on a mobile device.

This sentence doesn't sound right to me but I can't seem to make it proper....

"...historically a large concentration of wealth is placed in real property"

can someone english for me

What do you mean by real property? Physical property?

  On 10/22/2015 at 9:47 PM, Braintree said:

What do you mean by real property? Physical property?

Land and fixtures (any chattel sufficiently attached to land such as buildings)

  On 10/22/2015 at 6:18 PM, StephenG said:

This sentence doesn't sound right to me but I can't seem to make it proper....

 

"...historically a large concentration of wealth is placed in real property"

 

can someone english for me

Change the "is" to "has been" and it sounds right (prob because "historically" refers to things in the past).

I would also change "real" to "physical" since virtual currency is still real.

And historically it's been physical property and not virtual property.

Had a dream last night that I went to the cinema to see Return Of The King, except it was set in the present day. It was shit.

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:19 PM, Zephyr_Nova said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 6:18 PM, StephenG said:

This sentence doesn't sound right to me but I can't seem to make it proper....

 

"...historically a large concentration of wealth is placed in real property"

 

can someone english for me

 

Change the "is" to "has been" and it sounds right (prob because "historically" refers to things in the past).

 

that actually does sound better.

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:35 PM, Braintree said:

I would also change "real" to "physical" since virtual currency is still real.

And historically it's been physical property and not virtual property.

Real property is the legal term though, I have to stick with it.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/real+property

I see. It sounded like a term, so that's why I asked.

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:54 PM, StephenG said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:19 PM, Zephyr_Nova said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 6:18 PM, StephenG said:

This sentence doesn't sound right to me but I can't seem to make it proper....

 

"...historically a large concentration of wealth is placed in real property"

 

can someone english for me

 

Change the "is" to "has been" and it sounds right (prob because "historically" refers to things in the past).

 

that actually does sound better.

 

Also, some prof's love commas whenever they're applicable, in which case "historically, a large..." would be the way to go. Personally I think too many commas make writing seem choppy, so I'd stick with the way you have that part. But my gf's old writing prof would disagree.

  On 10/23/2015 at 1:56 AM, Zephyr_Nova said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:54 PM, StephenG said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 10:19 PM, Zephyr_Nova said:

 

  On 10/22/2015 at 6:18 PM, StephenG said:

This sentence doesn't sound right to me but I can't seem to make it proper....

 

"...historically a large concentration of wealth is placed in real property"

 

can someone english for me

 

Change the "is" to "has been" and it sounds right (prob because "historically" refers to things in the past).

 

that actually does sound better.

 

 

Also, some prof's love commas whenever they're applicable, in which case "historically, a large..." would be the way to go. Personally I think too many commas make writing seem choppy, so I'd stick with the way you have that part. But my gf's old writing prof would disagree.

 

i think using a semi colon; always makes you appear smarter.

Yeah; just insert semicolons everywhere; rules be damned;;;

:,,,;;;;,;;;;'''''..,.,;;:::;;;;;,.,.,.,;,.;,.;--

  On 10/23/2015 at 5:52 AM, StephenG said:

:,,,;;;;,;;;;'''''..,.,;;:::;;;;;,.,.,.,;,.;,.;--

A+ paper right there.

  On 10/23/2015 at 5:56 AM, Zephyr_Nova said:

 

  On 10/23/2015 at 5:52 AM, StephenG said:

:,,,;;;;,;;;;'''''..,.,;;:::;;;;;,.,.,.,;,.;,.;--

A+ paper right there.

 

The 4:33 of writing

or just stare at your prof, silent and unmoving, for exactly 4 minutes and 33 seconds when he asks you where your paper is.

Then cough wildly and take a bow.

......;'.;;;;'... I do what I can

A client came by with some of them new fangled Skullcandy phones that turn everything into a rumbly nightclub. I was hoping they might be useful for finding issues in the bottom end that might get missed on regular monitors, like maybe a guitar chord is activating the subs when it shouldn't, and that sort of thing. It seems for a lot of albums they just freak the hell out everywhere, but on the Prince tracks I tested them on, every bit that should have a bit of extra rumble had it and everything else was clean. Now the question is, can these nightmare headphones actually help me achieve the perfect, tight bottom end sound on my mixes? I had hoped someone in the know already had insight on this, but my googling only lead me to the expected (and well deserved) ridiculing of SC headphones. They actually add reverb to low end frequencies! Like if I press stop on a track, the bass resonates for a full second afterwards. Stupid! Yet I still think they could be useful for my purposes... I'm just not sure I want to subject the bones in my ears too much more to find out.

I keep typing in forum.awtmm.com by accident. This is a new thing, but since I started doing it it's a frequent recurrence.

*band name: Mistaken Muscle Memory