OBAMA: GAY MARRIAGE IS COOL WITH ME

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

it all makes sense now.

Good luck getting a well thought out answer to that. All you'll get are glib responses and one word replies.

If we let the gays adopt the future will be nothing but musicals.

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:17 PM, spratters said:

  On 5/10/2012 at 9:33 PM, Kanakori said:

  On 5/10/2012 at 8:13 PM, spratters said:

  On 5/10/2012 at 3:43 PM, Kanakori said:

Equality isn't about treating everyone the same way.

 

 

It's about treating what is diferent, diferently.

 

Still wrong.

No. It's called positive discrimination. It's used to lower inequalities, one example of that is the unemployment allowance.

It's pretty simple. If gays are hot, like Neil Patrick Harris and Tom Hardy, then by all means, have at it. But if they're a couple of hairy bull dykes that have fewer curves than a slab of beef, then...

Someone needs to research if lesbianism causes a woman's beauty gland to atrophy. It's very egg-chickeny: is Rosie O'Donnell gay because she's Rosie, or Rosie because she's gay?

(kill me now disparaissant)

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:13 PM, Kanakori said:

Just because I have a diferent opinion I'm limited. I think it's you that can see past yourself. I'm for gay marriage. I'm not for gay adoption because I'm not sure it's healthy for the child.

 

Gay adoption is a deviation and the kid didn't choose to live in it like the couple did..

Is alcoholism a deviation? And could you describe the consequences of gay adoption as a deviation in contrast to parenting behavior such as lack of care/attention to the child, lack of love/support. What about kids who are born with only one parent and that parent eventually turns gay? Should the child have a choice to abandon his/her parent? Hopefully these questions aren't too difficult for you to respond fully. It would certainly feel like a waste of time to continue this when all that remains is my wondering if you are a poor troll or if you have the skillz.

kanakori, are you religious by any chance?

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:24 PM, Kanakori said:

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

Again, what does natural or unnatural mean?

FYI

Nope. Stop trying to judge everyone.

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, Kanakori said:

Nope. Stop trying to judge everyone.

only you

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, patternoverlap said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:24 PM, Kanakori said:

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

 

Again, what does natural or unnatural mean?

 

FYI

The natural order is the sole evident reality we can still relly on. It attains perfect balances that should be perpetuated. Even though humanity is part of that and self regulates itself to this day, any system it creates will never be as perfect. Perfection is in nature.

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, Kanakori said:

Nope. Stop trying to judge everyone.

Asking if you are religious holds no judgement, it's merely a question. A question that holds relevance because you are refusing to defend your judgements on gay parenting/adoption.

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:17 PM, lumpenprol said:

I'm all for forced gay conversion of children, it's the only way we'll be able to conquer Middle Earth

Maybe you could be the lord of this ring?

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:24 PM, Kanakori said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, patternoverlap said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:24 PM, Kanakori said:

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

 

Again, what does natural or unnatural mean?

 

FYI

 

The natural order is the sole evident reality we can still relly on. It attains perfect balances that should be perpetuated. Even though humanity is part of that and self regulates itself to this day, any system it creates will never be as perfect. Perfection is in nature.

don't you think 'gay' is part of that natural perfect balance?

In a deterministic point of view? I don't know. In nature penis goes in vagina to make babies.

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:34 PM, Kanakori said:

In a deterministic point of view? I don't know. In nature penis goes in vagina to make babies.

there's more to a relationship between animals than making babies

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:24 PM, Kanakori said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, patternoverlap said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:24 PM, Kanakori said:

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

 

Again, what does natural or unnatural mean?

 

FYI

 

The natural order is the sole evident reality we can still relly on. It attains perfect balances that should be perpetuated. Even though humanity is part of that and self regulates itself to this day, any system it creates will never be as perfect. Perfection is in nature.

Homosexuality has existed for thousands of years within humanity and exists in the animal kingdom and therefore in nature.

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:35 PM, ruiagnelo said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:34 PM, Kanakori said:

In a deterministic point of view? I don't know. In nature penis goes in vagina to make babies.

 

there's more to a relationship between animals than making babies

Yes thtat's true there's more to it. But I was "answering" to his vague question.

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:36 PM, patternoverlap said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:24 PM, Kanakori said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:19 PM, patternoverlap said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 1:24 PM, Kanakori said:

I don't like to play God, I don't think we know weverything about these natural processes to change them so radically. Even if you don't believe in some kind of superior organization, you are ignoring millions of years of evolution.

 

Again, what does natural or unnatural mean?

 

FYI

 

The natural order is the sole evident reality we can still relly on. It attains perfect balances that should be perpetuated. Even though humanity is part of that and self regulates itself to this day, any system it creates will never be as perfect. Perfection is in nature.

 

Homosexuality has existed for thousands of years within humanity and exists in the animal kingdom and therefore in nature.

Again?

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:37 PM, Kanakori said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:35 PM, ruiagnelo said:

  On 5/11/2012 at 3:34 PM, Kanakori said:

In a deterministic point of view? I don't know. In nature penis goes in vagina to make babies.

 

there's more to a relationship between animals than making babies

 

Yes thtat's true there's more to it. But I was "answering" to his vague question.

how was my question vague?

I'm disappointed my argument against the 'unnatural' defense has gone completely by the wayside! No ad hominem attacks, no name-calling, just pure conceptual analysis elbow droppin' off the top rope, bitch!!

i mentioned how it made me horny.