The Controversial Statement Thread

Mr Joseph, what is your reasoning, if I may ask? (Sorry I can't quote your posts... my quote function has been broken for months. I need to change browsers or something.. )

I think the very evident conflict of interest lends credibility to my stream of logic that 9/11 was "allowed" by insiders, vs the alternate possibility that the 747s could have been shot down before impacting the twin towers.

By all means, elaborate because I've never done any actual research on the matter!

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:49 AM, LimpyLoo said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:39 AM, Joseph said:

 

Rejecting rational ways of thinking is a very practical way of defining "mentally retarded" so I conclude that you're a retard (and also a morally corrupt scum).

 

 

Umm what? How am I morally corrupt scum?

 

Also you should google 'science' and see how it actually works.

 

You are morally corrupt scum because you are ignoring atrocities committed by the US government, thereby enabling them to commit future atrocities.

I have a perfect understanding of how science works, and I sure as hell know it doesn't work by ignoring evidence, which is apparently what you do since we've had this conversation 2 times before, where I presented everything.

StephenG, I'll spam/quote a post I made earlier, it's just a sketch but it's the basic picture. I don't argue with links, so you'll have to check for yourself that I'm not bullshitting you about e.g. those air force drills. and I left out building 7, which is another independent smoking gun.

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:52 AM, Joseph said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:49 AM, LimpyLoo said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:39 AM, Joseph said:

 

Rejecting rational ways of thinking is a very practical way of defining "mentally retarded" so I conclude that you're a retard (and also a morally corrupt scum).

 

 

Umm what? How am I morally corrupt scum?

 

Also you should google 'science' and see how it actually works.

 

You are morally corrupt scum because you are ignoring atrocities committed by the US government, thereby enabling them to commit future atrocities.

 

I have a perfect understanding of how science works, and I sure as hell know it doesn't work by ignoring evidence, which is apparently what you do since we've had this conversation 2 times before, where I presented everything.

 

1) I am very actively and vocally opposed to the many actual, well-evidenced atrocities committed by the US government.

2) I'm sorry, I don't think you have a perfect understanding of how science works. How about this, provide something that you consider evidence and we'll see who thinks it's actual evidence. But remember the cliche "The plural of anecdote is not data."

Likely true. I wonder if relative documents are ever declassified..?

P.S. the fact that you thought that Sandy Hook was "50%" is pretty lol and does not bode well for you case as a rigorous scientist. Joseph.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:00 AM, LimpyLoo said:

P.S. the fact that you thought that Sandy Hook was "50%" is pretty lol and does not bode well for you case as a rigorous scientist. Joseph.

"pretty lol"? "does not bode well"? What the hell do these words mean? All your posts consist of vacuous nonsense. You're not even passing the Turing Test, you're a government bot that only offers generic cliched responses.

Do you have any other tips on how to become a rigorous scientist, LimpyLoo? I mean other than ignoring all evidence presented, not using Baye's Rule, etc.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:00 AM, StephenG said:

Likely true. I wonder if relative documents are ever declassified..?

The documents detailing the dozens of air force drills on 9/11 morning were declassified in I think 2004. In fact Bush called them "eerie" (or some similar term) when he saw them.

this infighting is exactly what 'they' want

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:09 AM, Joseph said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:00 AM, LimpyLoo said:

P.S. the fact that you thought that Sandy Hook was "50%" is pretty lol and does not bode well for you case as a rigorous scientist. Joseph.

"pretty lol"? "does not bode well"? What the hell do these words mean? All your posts consist of vacuous nonsense. You're not even passing the Turing Test, you're a government bot that only offers generic cliched responses.

 

Do you have any other tips on how to become a rigorous scientist, LimpyLoo? I mean other than ignoring all evidence presented, not using Baye's Rule, etc.

 

Yes, I ignore the sort of evidence that leads one to think that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Guilty as fucking charged, bro.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:11 AM, LimpyLoo said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:09 AM, Joseph said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:00 AM, LimpyLoo said:

P.S. the fact that you thought that Sandy Hook was "50%" is pretty lol and does not bode well for you case as a rigorous scientist. Joseph.

"pretty lol"? "does not bode well"? What the hell do these words mean? All your posts consist of vacuous nonsense. You're not even passing the Turing Test, you're a government bot that only offers generic cliched responses.

 

Do you have any other tips on how to become a rigorous scientist, LimpyLoo? I mean other than ignoring all evidence presented, not using Baye's Rule, etc.

 

 

Yes, I ignore the sort of evidence that leads one to think that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Guilty as fucking charged, bro.

 

"Guilty as fucking charged bro"

How long before your pre-programmed responses start recycling, bot?

Why on earth would you purposefully ignore any evidence? I mean shit if you're allowed to just ignore whatever you want...

I don't think Sandy Hook was a hoax, I am neutral. The reason I am neutral is because there were similar drills going on simultaneously, and these drills have happened over and over in correlation with various other bombings and "terrorist attacks" (like OKC, 9/11, London '04, Madrid, etc.) and in fact a portion of the scant media footage from Sandy Hook includes segments from these other drills (e.g. at st rose of lima school) which is highly bizarre. But I agree, these alone are not convincing, and not comparable to the case for MIHOP 9/11.

the greys are really us, but from the future

we ran out of dnas so we had to come back to the past to get some pure molecules

This is what I think of you idiots and your srupid opinions:

ALLAHU AKBAR!

  On 12/30/2013 at 2:54 AM, zaphod said:

autechre is tedious, boring music for people with autism.

conan o'brien is a self important, whiny twat.

arrested development isn't funny.

doctor who is wish fulfillment for annoying anglophile girls. no american man actually enjoys it.

philip k dick is a terrible writer.

kurt vonnegut is a terrible writer.

The gloves are off. I know it's all fun and games, but did you have to bring my main man, Philly D Steeze, up in thur?

I'll toss in my chip: In the new millenium, there's nothing more vulgar and tasteless than a pregnancy.

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:48 AM, DerWaschbar said:

You guys have terrible taste in root beer.

we were talking about store-bought common brands...at least thats my impression. otherwise, im all about the sarsaparilla friend

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:41 AM, MisterE said:

alex jones is a conspiracy

Funny you should mention that. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T8LgYADfTc8/Ufy9BW0zDTI/AAAAAAAAIJ8/oBvh1ZIY4gU/s1600/alex-jones-bill-hicks-teeth-proof.jpg

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:48 AM, SR4 said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:48 AM, DerWaschbar said:

You guys have terrible taste in root beer.

 

 

we were talking about store-bought common brands...at least thats my impression. otherwise, im all about the sarsaparilla friend

 

Oh nm Barqs.

Still Allahu Akbar tho.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:48 AM, deferlow said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:41 AM, MisterE said:

alex jones is a conspiracy

Funny you should mention that. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T8LgYADfTc8/Ufy9BW0zDTI/AAAAAAAAIJ8/oBvh1ZIY4gU/s1600/alex-jones-bill-hicks-teeth-proof.jpg

 

holy shit, that explains everything! including why i hate both of those guys.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:50 AM, MisterE said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:48 AM, deferlow said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:41 AM, MisterE said:

alex jones is a conspiracy

Funny you should mention that. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T8LgYADfTc8/Ufy9BW0zDTI/AAAAAAAAIJ8/oBvh1ZIY4gU/s1600/alex-jones-bill-hicks-teeth-proof.jpg

 

holy shit, that explains everything! including why i hate both of those guys.

 

wow that's some new shit

Human Form God Is Impossible.
Adult God is a Scam upon Children.

  On 12/30/2013 at 5:48 AM, deferlow said:

 

  On 12/30/2013 at 4:41 AM, MisterE said:

alex jones is a conspiracy

Funny you should mention that. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T8LgYADfTc8/Ufy9BW0zDTI/AAAAAAAAIJ8/oBvh1ZIY4gU/s1600/alex-jones-bill-hicks-teeth-proof.jpg

 

holyfuckin' LOL

i can believe it's not butter

@salv- ur the new shit now dog

controversial:

a) we don't only use 10% of our brains. (you don't have any untapped potential, this is as smart as you're ever gonna be unless you put chips on ya brain)

b) there isn't a fine line between 'genius' and insanity. people trying to eat their bedsheets in an asylum aren't one step away from einstein.

c) you are likely neither genius nor insane. tough tits but thems the breaks.

the ewoks were the best things in the original Star Wars trilogy

  On 12/30/2013 at 2:05 AM, RadarJammer said:

conan obrien had it coming

leno deserved that spot

i agree. leno is more organised at being funny.

i don't love or hate marmite, i just like it