Panama Papers

lol Alco you're priceless

just present some facts about greenwald's pro-putin sentiments and i will review them. otherwise you're just spouting predictable propaganda from the harris camp imo. and who cares about JE, he's not here anymore and he's also not some kind of powerful media figure. get real bro.

Go back and take a look and you'll see I pretty much spearheaded the "leave his sister out of it" after he left and people were being nasty

And then I point out a problematic trend I see among certain journalists, and leave their names out, but you personally are like "who? Say their names" and then tell me I'm taking a cheap shot at his sister

Boggles the fucking mind

  On 4/8/2016 at 10:46 PM, LimpyLoo said:

Go back and take a look and you'll see I pretty much spearheaded the "leave his sister out of it" after he left and people were being nasty

 

And then I point out a problematic trend I see among certain journalists, and leave their names out, but you personally are like "who? Say their names" and then tell me I'm taking a cheap shot at his sister

 

Boggles the fucking mind

i literally never said anything about you taking a cheap shot at his sister. i don't think you have taken a cheap shot at her at all, at least not to my knowledge. i do know, however, that since he's been banned you've brought him up and disparaged him which i think is cheap and i know you've been reprimanded about it by a moderator in at least one thread. i'm sorry your mind is boggled by this.

i await evidence about this pro-putin trend you see among american journalists.

Greenwald really goes out of his way to avoid criticizing Putin...but he loves to criticize people who criticize Putin

If you really need me to post individual examples of these folks being "pro-Putin" then I'll happily do it...in the meantime:

http://bfy.tw/5Apb

so, you want me to do your work for you in coming up with evidence for a pro-putin trend arising among american journalists? and the only comment you have about greenwald's "pro-putin" ideas is that he "avoids criticizing Putin?" lol?

#2deep4me

You guys argue about arguing a lot

(On iPad so I'll have to post examples one by one...)

http://www.businessinsider.com/glenn-greenwald-defends-snowden-putin-pr-stunt-2014-4

  On 4/8/2016 at 11:11 PM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

You guys argue about arguing a lot

PROVE IT.

  On 4/8/2016 at 10:29 PM, Gocab said:

Didn't awepittance leave watmm because certain elements became obsessed with taking cheap shots at his sister?

nope

My bad

  On 4/8/2016 at 11:12 PM, LimpyLoo said:

(On iPad so I'll have to post examples one by one...)

 

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/glenn-greenwald-defends-snowden-putin-pr-stunt-2014-4

in no way does this article present any evidence that greenwald is pro-putin.

This is very hard on iPad

I don't know how to quote tweets

Or link them

don't worry about it. if you have some time where it's easy, please post. otherwise just go about your day listening to lush pads and shit. imo.

I'll hop on PC tonight and present my case with the power of multiple tabs

lol sounds good. hope eugene gets in here with some inflamatory vibes and chen serves us with some scholarly documents.

*dances into thread*

  On 4/9/2016 at 12:13 AM, dr lopez said:

*dances into thread*

mods please close thread

Okay, so here's my premise:

-The aforementioned cadre of journalists act to minimize the offenses of Russia/Putin

(much in the same way they act to maximize the offenses of US Gov't)

-They seek out criticisms of Russia/Putin to defend against

-Concessions of Russian offenses--which are not frequent--are often bundled with "yeah, but America is one to talk"

here are some tweets from one of these journalists from the last few days

is it too late for the obligatory "cum" post?

cums*

Glen Greenwald, when asked by a fellow journalist why he appears slow to criticism Russia, said this

But there are a couple problems with what he says

1) Greenwald is not merely silent about Russia

he talks about Russia frequently, but always to defend it

the same cannot be said of the other offenses/offenders on his list

2) In it, Greenwald criticizes the journalist for "Whataboutism"

However, it seems to be his go-to technique when responding to criticisms of Russia/Putin.

regarding criticisms of Russia Today:

"There is apparently a rule that says it’s perfectly OK for a journalist to work for a media outlet owned and controlled by a weapons manufacturer (GE/NBC/MSNBC), or by the U.S. and British governments (BBC/Stars & Stripes/Voice of America), or by Rupert Murdoch and Saudi Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal (Wall St. Journal/Fox News), or by a banking corporation with long-standing ties to right-wing governments (Politico), or by for-profit corporations whose profits depend upon staying in the good graces of the U.S. government (Kaplan/The Washington Post), or by loyalists to one of the two major political parties (National Review/TPM/countless others), but it’s an intrinsic violation of journalistic integrity to work for a media outlet owned by the Russian government."

the same "Whataboutism" appears in the first link in my previous post

again, where Greenwald brings up offenses of US in response to criticism of Russia

i'm gonna have another smoke

Lumpy, stop sucking on Sam Harris tits , be your own man, man

Both glenn and Sam are good guys, they are just being bitches and you choose a team cause that's what human do, they love sports and teams.

Lumpy ist tot, aber der Limpy...

  On 4/9/2016 at 1:59 AM, Deer said:

Lumpy, stop sucking on Sam Harris tits , be your own man, man

Both glenn and Sam are good guys, they are just being bitches and you choose a team cause that's what human do, they love sports and teams.

i'm not sucking on SH's tits and I don't think GG is a bad guy

*wipes milk from lips*