Jump to content
IGNORED

Lars von Trier - The Nymphomaniac


Recommended Posts

So it's Lars von Triers The Hobbit, this one? I hope it's not 40fps.

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 11/13/2013 at 8:00 PM, xox said:

Charlotte Gainsbourg?! Again?! Couldn't he find an uglier actress? ...and no, i don't like her acting either.

 

If it's a trilogy, then it makes sense. Personally I don't find her ugly at all. Anyway, i think this is a compliment to any film nowadays, when there are "ugly" actors in cast. Then again, the whole critique of most blockbusters today consists of naming some superstar ugly. That girl from Twilight is a good example.

Guest the anonymous forumite
  On 11/12/2013 at 10:05 AM, John Ehrlichman said:

 

  On 11/12/2013 at 9:38 AM, the anonymous forumite said:

I'm not sure LVT has anything to prove in terms of provocation.

 

He practically announced the movie premise as something that in certain european countries could be classified as child porn, a preteen girl acting out her nymphomania..

 

 

So you're saying that you're disapointed that Nymphomaniac won't include any child porn-like material ? :biggrin:

 

Nah, seriously, LVT had his fair share of provocation (idiots, antichrist, interviews) and as far as he's delivering quality films, I'm happy imo.

  On 11/13/2013 at 8:15 PM, Amen Lare said:

 

  On 11/13/2013 at 8:00 PM, xox said:

Charlotte Gainsbourg?! Again?! Couldn't he find an uglier actress? ...and no, i don't like her acting either.

 

If it's a trilogy, then it makes sense. Personally I don't find her ugly at all. Anyway, i think this is a compliment to any film nowadays, when there are "ugly" actors in cast. Then again, the whole critique of most blockbusters today consists of naming some superstar ugly. That girl from Twilight is a good example.

 

 

 

**imagining her instead of sharon stone in basic instinct** :wtf:

 

sorry, i like watching beautiful ppl on tv if i can choose but good acting is conditio sine qua non, of coures

 

if you find her beautiful, good for u man, lucky u i'd say

I find her pretty hot as well, but let's not turn it into a thread about her looks. I'm sick and tired of the supersymmetrical, zero personality pretty that's fronted by the media.

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

it's not just the ugly/beautiful category the thing is i can't see nothing ELSE in/on her that makes me watch her with satisfaction

 

edit: ok, maybe i could but there are other actresses that i can think of i'd like to see in her movies instead of her

Edited by xox
  On 11/13/2013 at 9:24 PM, xox said:

 

  On 11/13/2013 at 8:15 PM, Amen Lare said:

 

  On 11/13/2013 at 8:00 PM, xox said:

Charlotte Gainsbourg?! Again?! Couldn't he find an uglier actress? ...and no, i don't like her acting either.

 

If it's a trilogy, then it makes sense. Personally I don't find her ugly at all. Anyway, i think this is a compliment to any film nowadays, when there are "ugly" actors in cast. Then again, the whole critique of most blockbusters today consists of naming some superstar ugly. That girl from Twilight is a good example.

 

 

 

**imagining her instead of sharon stone in basic instinct** :wtf:

 

sorry, i like watching beautiful ppl on tv if i can choose but good acting is conditio sine qua non, of coures

 

if you find her beautiful, good for u man, lucky u i'd say

 

 

Trier wouldn't direct Basic Instinct the way it was. I don't see a point in being proud of your own fetishism, which isn't even your own one, but was given to you in mass production. Like yeah, i enjoy brushing my teeth with fancy toothpaste too, but i don't have much industry alternatives. I don't find Charlotte especially beautiful or bodily attractive, she's regular looking girl who i could be attracted to in real life if i like her invisible features. Don't see how it can be considered lucky. I don't rate primal instincts very high.

 

And she's not a full-time actress, as i know. Bjork wasn't an actress too. Means nothing.

  On 11/13/2013 at 9:54 PM, Amen Lare said:

 

 

I don't find Charlotte especially beautiful or bodily attractive, she's regular looking girl who i could be attracted to in real life if i like her invisible features. Don't see how it can be considered lucky.

 

in real life is totally different story with knowing her 'invisible features'...i was talking on tv.

i'm just saying that i cant see any of those invisible features that could be relevant to me while watching her on tv but i considered you lucky seeing something i haven't.

 

and btw...i don't think finding sharon stone attractive as something given to me in mind-washing illuminati mass production. lol man, are you for real?

you've gone too far

i mean... she's not my wife so i could have benefits from her 'invisible features'. all i have from her is how she acts and how she looks. that's what i'm paying for, she an actress for god's sake

i could have more 'benefit' from her if she enriches planet earth in some other ways and i'd be so glad and fulfilled, damn it, lets face it, we can't think everything in terms of erections, right?

Edited by xox
  • 2 weeks later...

I saw this earlier and my initial thoughts were ''It's no Melacholia"

I dunno, looks like he's addressing some themes thats he's been rambling on about in interviews for years so i think it will be therapeutic for him to get it out of his system and then go an make a nice Disney film or something.

  On 11/13/2013 at 7:25 PM, MadameChaos said:

Incorrect. It was over 5 hours long but has been split into two two hour parts.

 

Wait, so 4 hours isn't the same as two two hour parts?

Movie looks great, cant wait (people are gonna bitch about the sex, they'll rather watch people get shot)

 

rammstein did the theme song, lol

Edited by Deer

my favorite part was when she had cum dripping out off her mouth after sucking that guy off (no duh)

 

whats not to like, looks like a lot of fun!

nice juxtaposition of stuff in the trailer, looks like there is someone injured or dying in bed as she's dripping down her leg. psychosexual mindfuck ftw

Looking forward to this. Von Trier is if not anything else then always interesting and worth a trip to the cinema for.

foods in the tone of 'go to the fuckin store'

patayda chips

apple cracker thangies

carrots in brown paper bag

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×