School Shooting in Connecticut

haven't read this thread but while robbie parker is likely the father of the little girl who got shot, there's the possibility that adam lanza isn't the killer. if there's irrefutable evidence that he's the killer, i'm not aware of it. i don't find it such a crazy irrational thought that the shooting would be a false flag in order to change the legislation on guns.

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:22 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

haven't read this thread but while robbie parker is likely the father of the little girl who got shot, there's the possibility that adam lanza isn't the killer. if there's irrefutable evidence that he's the killer, i'm not aware of it. i don't find it such a crazy irrational thought that the shooting would be a false flag in order to change the legislation on guns.

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:28 PM, triachus said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:22 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

haven't read this thread but while robbie parker is likely the father of the little girl who got shot, there's the possibility that adam lanza isn't the killer. if there's irrefutable evidence that he's the killer, i'm not aware of it. i don't find it such a crazy irrational thought that the shooting would be a false flag in order to change the legislation on guns.

 

anything more constructive to put on the table?

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:31 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:28 PM, triachus said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:22 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

haven't read this thread but while robbie parker is likely the father of the little girl who got shot, there's the possibility that adam lanza isn't the killer. if there's irrefutable evidence that he's the killer, i'm not aware of it. i don't find it such a crazy irrational thought that the shooting would be a false flag in order to change the legislation on guns.

 

 

anything more constructive to put on the table?

LOL^2

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

BECAUSE 1776 BABY

/AlexJones

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

i'm not saying it's necessarily a false flag, i just don't see why they wouldn't go to such extremities. i personnally can't think seriously of 911 being something else than a false flag. in that perspective, if a government is ok with killing 3000 of its own people in a false flag operation, this shooting is a joke in comparison.

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:22 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

if there's irrefutable evidence that he's the killer, i'm not aware of it. i don't find it such a crazy irrational thought that the shooting would be a false flag in order to change the legislation on guns.

10/10

the awepittance is strong with this one

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

the united states government kills children all the time.

  On 1/12/2013 at 3:19 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

 

i'm not saying it's necessarily a false flag, i just don't see why they wouldn't go to such extremities. i personnally can't think seriously of 911 being something else than a false flag. in that perspective, if a government is ok with killing 3000 of its own people in a false flag operation, this shooting is a joke in comparison.

By your logic, the US gov't must therefor be responsible for every attack where less than 3000 people died.

(The problem with using Cui Bono as your investigative compass is that anytime anything happens it inadvertently benefits someone somewhere. And afterwards when looking over the data it is easy to see patterns that aren't there)

  On 1/12/2013 at 10:33 PM, LimpyLoo said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 3:19 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

 

i'm not saying it's necessarily a false flag, i just don't see why they wouldn't go to such extremities. i personnally can't think seriously of 911 being something else than a false flag. in that perspective, if a government is ok with killing 3000 of its own people in a false flag operation, this shooting is a joke in comparison.

 

 

 

By your logic, the US gov't must therefor be responsible for every attack where less than 3000 people died.

 

 

 

(The problem with using Cui Bono as your investigative compass is that anytime anything happens it inadvertently benefits someone somewhere. And afterwards when looking over the data it is easy to see patterns that aren't there)

show me evidence that adam lanza was the killer, that's all i'm asking for.

and nice example of reductio ad absurdum, i could see it coming.

  On 1/12/2013 at 11:43 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

reductio ad absurdum!

  On 1/13/2013 at 12:06 AM, The Overlook said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 11:43 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

reductio ad absurdum!

 

lol

what i find at least slightly indisputable is that the video shows a "dad" of the child murdered...

he goes from laughing rapidly to a sort of "feigned sorrow" and it's really quite clear

leading to the thought, "is he acting?"

why would they need an actor?

now, if it's really just "nervous laughter" (which it doesn't seem like at all... nervous laughter to sorrow just like that?)... well

the only other option out of these three is that he's a sociopath

or they're a town of Satanists like from x files

on the other hand, fuck it i don't want to think about it

i did pick up on a really weird vibe after the shooting though... like from the parents, where they just seemed a little too non-chalant about the whole thing overall

I could be wrong

the whole event was bizarrely fishy

but i doubt it was for gun control, I doubt that will really happen

  On 1/12/2013 at 11:43 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 10:33 PM, LimpyLoo said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 3:19 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

 

i'm not saying it's necessarily a false flag, i just don't see why they wouldn't go to such extremities. i personnally can't think seriously of 911 being something else than a false flag. in that perspective, if a government is ok with killing 3000 of its own people in a false flag operation, this shooting is a joke in comparison.

 

 

 

By your logic, the US gov't must therefor be responsible for every attack where less than 3000 people died.

 

 

 

(The problem with using Cui Bono as your investigative compass is that anytime anything happens it inadvertently benefits someone somewhere. And afterwards when looking over the data it is easy to see patterns that aren't there)

 

show me evidence that adam lanza was the killer, that's all i'm asking for.

and nice example of reductio ad absurdum, i could see it coming.

If we're talking logical fallacies, bro, then consider "I haven't seen satisfactory evidence that Adam Lanza was the killer therefor I am gonna assume (without any evidence) that it was the US government trying to take away our guns."

aren't there survivors who can identify adam lanza as the shooter?

  On 1/13/2013 at 1:11 AM, pattern recognition said:

aren't there survivors who can identify adam lanza as the shooter?

They're all gov't shills, so that doesn't count.

  On 1/13/2013 at 1:10 AM, LimpyLoo said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 11:43 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 10:33 PM, LimpyLoo said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 3:19 PM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/12/2013 at 2:50 PM, OneToThirtySix said:

"A plea that reaches the hearts of enough Americans to allow greater restrictions on gun control = slaughter twenty toddlers"?

 

Shit, if this WAS a conspiracy, the US government would get wiped out when evidence surfaced.

 

i'm not saying it's necessarily a false flag, i just don't see why they wouldn't go to such extremities. i personnally can't think seriously of 911 being something else than a false flag. in that perspective, if a government is ok with killing 3000 of its own people in a false flag operation, this shooting is a joke in comparison.

 

 

 

By your logic, the US gov't must therefor be responsible for every attack where less than 3000 people died.

 

 

 

(The problem with using Cui Bono as your investigative compass is that anytime anything happens it inadvertently benefits someone somewhere. And afterwards when looking over the data it is easy to see patterns that aren't there)

 

show me evidence that adam lanza was the killer, that's all i'm asking for.

and nice example of reductio ad absurdum, i could see it coming.

 

If we're talking logical fallacies, bro, then consider "I haven't seen satisfactory evidence that Adam Lanza was the killer therefor I am gonna assume (without any evidence) that it was the US government trying to take away our guns."

i'm not saying it has to be a false flag because no evidence was shown, i say it's a posssibility.

there was a school shooting in france last year and many elements indicated that the presumed killer had been working for the french intelligence. the special forces killed him while he could have been arrested, the lawyer of his family says that the presumed killer claimed his innocence in his taped conversation with the police, he said "you betrayed me". the lawyer said publicly that the whole case was a false flag by the french intelligence. as a result of the killing, the public opinion has become even more hostile to arabs, and netanyahu sung "ham israel hai" in the french-israeli school where the shooting happened. what a weird thing to do.

so i wouldn't be surprised if the sandy hook shooting was a semi-similar case, with the secret services behind it.

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

and people are using odd grieving expressions and a camera shot of the school name on a Batman movie.

  On 1/13/2013 at 4:36 AM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 

 

 

and people are using odd grieving expressions and a camera shot of the school name on a Batman movie.

i can only agree with you. but again, as far as i know, very little evidence that lanza was the killer was shown.

  On 1/13/2013 at 5:38 AM, Brian Tregaskin said:

  On 1/13/2013 at 4:36 AM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 

 

 

and people are using odd grieving expressions and a camera shot of the school name on a Batman movie.

 

i can only agree with you. but again, as far as i know, very little evidence that lanza was the killer was shown.

  On 1/13/2013 at 1:11 AM, pattern recognition said:

aren't there survivors who can identify adam lanza as the shooter?

  On 1/12/2013 at 6:30 PM, eugene said:

the awepittance is strong with this one

haha! i had a feeling before i even hit the un-ignore button your post in this thread would be about me, just admit it ... you cant get enough of me