How 'Rational Atheists' spread anti Islam pro US military propaganda

  On 4/12/2013 at 9:35 AM, Iain C said:

Compson, is everything alright at home?

so quick to characterize my motivations again lol...

but to answer your question... No things are not ok right now, thanks for asking. The other day you proposed a vote to put me to death and since then I have been paranoid , locked inside my home. I haven't eaten much food nor brushed my teeth. I am starting to feel a bit better now that you are a little empathetic towards me. So thank you for your cocern. I'll keep you posted.

Or will you?

  On 4/12/2013 at 9:35 AM, Iain C said:

Compson, is everything alright at home?

With all the islamofascism going around, I don't think so.

  On 4/12/2013 at 9:42 AM, compson said:

The other day you proposed a vote to put me to death

I seem to remember that the vote was actually in favour. As you're such a steadfast friend of democracy worldwide, would you kindly rest your neck on this block here?

Omar has a lot to get through today, and he's eager to get started ASAP.

I haven't committed a crime, nice try.

In fact, because you have shown your complete lack of appreciation for the rights you do have, while defending religious fascist morons that reign terror over women, gays, and anyone else who doesn't buy into their religious bullshit, I think it would be a good thing to have a culturally rich experience and fly on down to Egypt and give someone who wants democracy your citizenship, and trade places. Shit we can start a list for all you islamofascists apologists and eventually, in time, watmm will become even more tolerant and culturally enriched. So I am on board for this proposal and will get working on the paperwork. And hey, this might open up an opportunity for me to meet a muslim and therefore cure my islamophobia.

nazi

comspon would u have sex with an muslim woman if she was smokin hot u know wat im sayin

e: not smokin cus she was a suicide bomber etc etc

shes secular but from a muslim family and her dad might throw acid in your face

  On 4/12/2013 at 1:53 PM, compson said:

I haven't committed a crime, nice try.

 

In fact, because you have shown your complete lack of appreciation for the rights you do have, while defending religious fascist morons that reign terror over women, gays, and anyone else who doesn't buy into their religious bullshit, I think it would be a good thing to have a culturally rich experience and fly on down to Egypt and give someone who wants democracy your citizenship, and trade places. Shit we can start a list for all you islamofascists apologists and eventually, in time, watmm will become even more tolerant and culturally enriched. So I am on board for this proposal and will get working on the paperwork. And hey, this might open up an opportunity for me to meet a muslim and therefore cure my islamophobia.

 

 

nazi

You might be smarter than me, Compson, but your legalese won't save you here. The people have spoken. Neck. Block. Now.

If this lady is just wandering around in the middle of the woods at this hour offering sex, then she is either mentally deranged or she is enabling acid throwing jihad. I'd still have sex with her, but like James Bond, i'd keep a close eye on her hands so she doesn't try anything funny. no beheading my penis or other horrors. islamofacism will not win.

  On 4/12/2013 at 1:56 PM, RichieBees said:

comspon would u have sex with an muslim woman if she was smokin hot u know wat im sayin

e: not smokin cus she was a suicide bomber etc etc

shes secular but from a muslim family and her dad might throw acid in your face

holy shit lol

holy shit, ok I think we've been trolled folks. Either that or Compson is experiencing a manic episode

Check out this from the front page of watmm.com today



should we be worried or feel stupid for being sucked into an obvious troll attempt?


first i thought he had me on ignore because almost every question i ask him goes completely unanswered and or a URL or an unrelated diatribe is the response to a section of my quote, but now i'm just... well worried.

there is a third option, that Compson actually started to take a turn for the right wing suddenly, a few months back and now faced with extreme opposition and ridicule has decided to start parodying himself intentionally to take off the heat. maybe a half-troll attempt?

you think you can continue to try and figure out my motivations as a way to eventually discourage me..? well think again

and while you do that, maybe at least attempt to respond to my rebuttals sometime, you know since you are such a believer in community cohesion and freedom of speech

because I am not here to have a discussion about motivations. If I wanted to learn more about peoples motivations through the internet I'd probably eventually realize, in time, that I'm reading words on a fucking rectangular screen.

so please, for the sake of community cohesion, please do stay on-topic and save the motivations for you and your islamofascist apologists.

$5 (in WATMM fun bux) says that Compson went off meds or experienced a major stressor in the last month or two.

yo brendan, would you be interested in meeting up to discuss islamofascism in a cafe downtown sometime? as long as we're talking for more than ten minutes or so we're bound to see a muslim pass by, and we can invite them to come join the discussion. it could be fun.

frankly I am not too interested in carrying out something of that nature. first of all talking to random strangers about anything beyond chit chat is awkward and a potential invasion of privacy in my opinion.

second, just because they are muslim does not mean they are a more reliable source for religious criticisms. especially muslims as they put people in jail for this http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3026/lars-hedegaard-acquitted

I do appreciate the offer. but seriously, i'd have to be insane to approach random muslims with these kinds of criticisms. even if they were completely reasonable and thoughtful people. I would feel like a dick asking the hard questions. my purpose is here, where you islamofascist apologists are who know that totalitarian religion is not good for society and should be put to an end. the only way that happens without blood is through public discourse and peaceful demonstrations. not confrontational greenpeace save the pandas bullshit.

if you know any muslims, I would be cool with that. would be interesting and potentially worthwhile/in-depth. but then again there is a reason I don't seek christians and mormons and ask them about their faith. (you know why)

really? you're linking to the gatestone institute? lol

  On 4/13/2013 at 12:57 AM, zaphod said:

really? you're linking to the gatestone institute? lol

wikipedia if you like.

  Quote

In 2011, he was convicted of hate speech under the Article 266b of the Danish Penal Code, and fined 5,000 kroner. He had made critical remarks against the Islamic society, which included “girls in Muslim families are raped by their uncles, their cousins, or their dad.” He later clarified that he did not intend to accuse all the Muslims of abusing their children.^[4] He appealed the verdict, and in 2012, the Supreme Court acquitted him in a 7-0 decision.^[5]

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Hedegaard

lol compson you keep posting videos from Pat Condell. You seem to have no opinions of your own, all you do is post bullshit from your favorite militant atheist.

I believe you think we are dumb enough to believe you're coherent.

  On 4/13/2013 at 2:21 AM, Deer said:

lol compson you keep posting videos from Pat Condell. You seem to have no opinions of your own, all you do is post bullshit from your favorite militant atheist.

 

I believe you think we are dumb enough to believe you're coherent.

I think it's clear that this forum just doesn't care one iota about islamofascism

because if you did, you'd know that there is no new opinion in regards to religion and that criticizing someone for representing a fact (that has been around since 1,400 AD), is hardly a sign of incoherence.

Let me just spell this out for you one more time, because you clearly missed it:

Faith is believing something without evidence ie a delusion.

I personally find the Koran to be intolerant and morally repulsive. And it doesn't make me a bigot or a racist for saying that. It's the truth.

It's more offensive suggesting I should censor my speech because the islamofascists are on some moral high ground. That's the offensive part. You are permitting rational thinking from circulating into communities because you think you need to protect these religious fanatics from the truth. That's the real racism. You actually think they need this bullshit to have good morals. Which in of itself is an incoherent belief.

Telling people that a book is God's word is just flat out lying.

the fact that your go to sources are all neocon think thanks and youtube videos of some demented guy with an english accent is all i need to know. you're either a masterful troll or an idiot.

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:10 AM, compson said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 2:21 AM, Deer said:

lol compson you keep posting videos from Pat Condell. You seem to have no opinions of your own, all you do is post bullshit from your favorite militant atheist.

 

I believe you think we are dumb enough to believe you're coherent.

I personally find the Koran to be intolerant and morally repulsive. And it doesn't make me a bigot or a racist for saying that. It's the truth.

 

 

 

Im in complete agreement with that. \The rest of your argument is complete and utter shit.

No one is "refuting" your arguments because you never had one on a sturdy logical premise in the first place. Everything keeps shifting back to Islam= Other, and anyone that disagrees with that is not only a pinko-leftie, but a supporter of Islamofascism (i still have yet to see you or anyone else appropriately define this term within constructs of ideological reality btw).

I mean, continue on your righteous crusade to liberate WATMM from the shackles of liberal arts educations; it's entertaining at this point. But no amount of copy-paste wiki links/right-wing blog sites are going to justify this nonsense.

i feel bad for awepittance because the original article has nothing to do with compson's tirade. although, in a way, compson is demonstrating the original piece's point. can we get a parallel discussion going about greenwald's piece? maybe a compson/islamowhatever subforum?

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:21 AM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:10 AM, compson said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 2:21 AM, Deer said:

lol compson you keep posting videos from Pat Condell. You seem to have no opinions of your own, all you do is post bullshit from your favorite militant atheist.

 

I believe you think we are dumb enough to believe you're coherent.

I personally find the Koran to be intolerant and morally repulsive. And it doesn't make me a bigot or a racist for saying that. It's the truth.

 

 

 

 

Im in complete agreement with that. \The rest of your argument is complete and utter shit.

 

No one is "refuting" your arguments because you never had one on a sturdy logical premise in the first place. Everything keeps shifting back to Islam= Other, and anyone that disagrees with that is not only a pinko-leftie, but a supporter of Islamofascism (i still have yet to see you or anyone else appropriately define this term within constructs of ideological reality btw).

 

I mean, continue on your righteous crusade to liberate WATMM from the shackles of liberal arts educations; it's entertaining at this point. But no amount of copy-paste wiki links/right-wing blog sites are going to justify this nonsense.

 

Are you kidding me?

Islamofascism = Sharia Law

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:27 AM, compson said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:21 AM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 3:10 AM, compson said:

 

  On 4/13/2013 at 2:21 AM, Deer said:

lol compson you keep posting videos from Pat Condell. You seem to have no opinions of your own, all you do is post bullshit from your favorite militant atheist.

 

I believe you think we are dumb enough to believe you're coherent.

I personally find the Koran to be intolerant and morally repulsive. And it doesn't make me a bigot or a racist for saying that. It's the truth.

 

 

 

 

Im in complete agreement with that. \The rest of your argument is complete and utter shit.

 

No one is "refuting" your arguments because you never had one on a sturdy logical premise in the first place. Everything keeps shifting back to Islam= Other, and anyone that disagrees with that is not only a pinko-leftie, but a supporter of Islamofascism (i still have yet to see you or anyone else appropriately define this term within constructs of ideological reality btw).

 

I mean, continue on your righteous crusade to liberate WATMM from the shackles of liberal arts educations; it's entertaining at this point. But no amount of copy-paste wiki links/right-wing blog sites are going to justify this nonsense.

 

 

Are you kidding me?

 

Islamofascism = Sharia Law

 

ok, so what is regular, unadulterated fascism?

"Believing something without evidence" really doesn't mean "delusion." Please be careful with your words; it's statements like that that will discredit you in any circle that is actually tolerant of religion but wants to stop the bad parts that can arise with it. Unless you're out to make enemies, speaking with such venom about things you are not involved in will only hurt your case. That's part of why I want to go get coffee with you and pull a few muslims into the conversation. It would force you to word your "rational discourse" in a way that is not so full of fire, as you would actually need to convince the people you say you care so much about that they would be better off without their religion. It's a tall order, but short of being able to convince them, you are essentially proposing that we (the west) "take" religious faith from a group of 1 billion + people, and that just won't work. Belief cannot be taken from someone, and the harder you would try to tell them they're wrong, the more they will retreat to their own beliefs and consider yours toxic.

Back to "faith" - you believe all sorts of things without evidence. We all do. We have to, because there isn't evidence for every decision we need to make. You have faith in certain human beings (Pat Condell, apparently) despite not knowing him or being able to collect evidence of his truthfulness directly from him, just as an example. You are relying on faith that he is truthful. I've watched a few of those videos; dude has an agenda and is clearly biased. I do not put faith in him.

Have you read and attempted to understand the Quran with an open mind? If not, I urge you to really think about your claim that you are fighting intolerance. There are over 1,400 verses in the Quran that demand Muslims to take care of the planet and protect the environment; is that morally repulsive? Or are you just honing in on the out-of-context verses you find on websites, and extrapolating "moral repugnance" to the rest of the book? The Bible demanded that the Jews decapitated the women and infants of a warring tribe (it's in Second Kings); if we focused on that, we'd see the Jewish people as incredibly violent savages, and Christians ready to follow in those footsteps. But the rest of the Old Testament has many other messages, and the most violent parts are considered by many religious people to be stories passed on by a warring tribal band, not the Word of God, and Christ himself had much to say against just such actions. Christians insist they follow Christ, not the book of Kings. Religious texts themselves are difficult to read; they are layered with meaning and very little of it is typically literal. Literalists or Fundamentalists might tell you otherwise, but to lump an entire religious system into one interpretation is dangerous, ignorant, and downright intolerant.

This isn't about censoring you, it's about holding you up to the same standards you want to see the rest of the world adhere to. There can be no fighting intolerance with intolerance. It doesn't work.

so does halakha = judeofascism?