Jump to content

Recommended Posts

By pour-over I don't mean anything fancy, just pouring hot water over your grounds instead of having a machine do it. It's the way my maternal grandparents made coffee, hardly a "scene".

yeah hario single pour over with a goose neck kettle has by far the easiest to best tasting ratio of all the options. French press is trash. the mud, the cleaning. moka pots are great, still takes more time and there’s cleaning. I once did the math on how much I spend on to go coffee every year and could have bought a damn gaggia

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

Yeah, sorry. There are a lot of these guys around nowadays.

 

 

Anyway, I like to make Turkish coffee in a little copper kettle thingie every now and then, sweet and weird and so so muddy, but the "mud" falls to the bottom. It's more of a desert than a cup of coffee though. Sounds like the French press you've had has been made with too finely ground coffee? The grounds are supposed stay in the pot, and you just rinse it out with water...

Edited by Gocab

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Oh yeah, pour over has been my main method since highschool... though I never knew that was what it's called.  To me it was just "I'm making coffee."  Moka pot's been a new addition to my life, and the quality of my morning cups have been ultimately more satisfying.  It's really just a big espresso though.

  On 2/28/2018 at 2:46 AM, messiaen said:

we are travelling through what you can kind of think of as still space at over 1 million miles an hour. thats pretty fucking mental. imagine if some kind of quantum accident happened where the earth became trapped by the dimensions within a vacuum and the earth just stopped dead from a speed of 1 million miles an hour. 

Everything not firmly attached would fly off the Earth and into space, continuing to travel at million miles/h, eventually hitting another lucky planet and inseminate it with their DNA. The life cycle continues

The general concensus on evolution (as I understand it) is that all species share a common anscenstor as in all species on earth are branches of the same tree. Something that has been nagging me about this is the following...

 

Be it that either life was created here or came from eslewhere shouldn't there reasonably have been several instances of that occurring not only geographically but during time? My point being, shouldn't there be evidence of species being branches of several different trees? is there evidence of this? and if not... isn't that incredibly odd an improvable?

  On 2/28/2018 at 3:16 PM, MIXL2 said:

The general concensus on evolution (as I understand it) is that all species share a common anscenstor as in all species on earth are branches of the same tree. Something that has been nagging me about this is the following...

 

Be it that either life was created here or came from eslewhere shouldn't there reasonably have been several instances of that occurring not only geographically but during time? My point being, shouldn't there be evidence of species being branches of several different trees? is there evidence of this? and if not... isn't that incredibly odd an improvable?

 

Well nothing is proven so far and the question of origins of life is still here. However, the primordial state were simple elements joining into complex compounds. Initially there was only a chemical evolution with the basic elements which eventually formed first biological monomers, with carbon being the most capable of forming diverse polymers that are able to form cells from molecules. How? I don't know. But there are very plausible theories of self-organization on the atomic and subatomic levels, going up the scales. Like a master-algorithm if you like. This chaotic process could form first simple cells who then went through a biological evolution, which probably eliminated unsuitable cells unable to exist in the current state of Earth's environment. As the Earth's environment gradually changed, cells had to evolve into a greater diversity, but the original different cells also gradually could not adapt anymore. So, there is probably this champion cell....

  On 2/28/2018 at 4:02 PM, Godwin Austen said:

 

  On 2/28/2018 at 3:16 PM, MIXL2 said:

The general concensus on evolution (as I understand it) is that all species share a common anscenstor as in all species on earth are branches of the same tree. Something that has been nagging me about this is the following...

 

Be it that either life was created here or came from eslewhere shouldn't there reasonably have been several instances of that occurring not only geographically but during time? My point being, shouldn't there be evidence of species being branches of several different trees? is there evidence of this? and if not... isn't that incredibly odd an improvable?

Well nothing is proven so far and the question of origins of life is still here. However, the primordial state were simple elements joining into complex compounds. Initially there was only a chemical evolution with the basic elements which eventually formed first biological monomers, with carbon being the most capable of forming diverse polymers that are able to form cells from molecules. How? I don't know. But there are very plausible theories of self-organization on the atomic and subatomic levels, going up the scales. Like a master-algorithm if you like. This chaotic process could form first simple cells who then went through a biological evolution, which probably eliminated unsuitable cells unable to exist in the current state of Earth's environment. As the Earth's environment gradually changed, cells had to evolve into a greater diversity, but the original different cells also gradually could not adapt anymore. So, there is probably this champion cell....

maybe.. is an interesting train of thought nevertheless

farts are shitty air

 

if you can smell something, it's probably little shit particles or something, no? What if you can taste it? Are you eating shit air? 

Edited by Bulk VanderHooj

 

  On 1/19/2020 at 5:27 PM, Richie Sombrero said:

Nah, you're a wee child who can't wait for official release. Embarrassing. Shove your privilege. 

  On 9/2/2014 at 12:37 AM, Ivan Ooze said:

don't be a cockroach prolapsing nun bulkV

I now half regret breathing in so deeply post flatulence for most of my life

 

  On 1/19/2020 at 5:27 PM, Richie Sombrero said:

Nah, you're a wee child who can't wait for official release. Embarrassing. Shove your privilege. 

  On 9/2/2014 at 12:37 AM, Ivan Ooze said:

don't be a cockroach prolapsing nun bulkV

gradually become aware of the external forces consuming your energetic potential

slowly recapture it & redirect the energy into your trax (trax being a metaphorical or literal term here)

trax expand beyond the confines of present moment spacetime in which they are contained

ppl sense extradimensional forces being revealed thru yor trax

trax become lodged in the minds of millions

individual ppls imagination-expanded version of yor trax slowly allows some of them to become sentient

trax spread thruout the boundless universes

If lobsters were land animals, would we still eat them? The fact that they have to live in water to survive makes them less creepy and creates a safe distance. If huge spiders from the rain forest were as delicious with heaps of butter on them, would they be in such high demand? I have my doubts, and dare I say, you should too...

The fact that lobsters and crabs and prawns are basically giant dank sea insects makes them ever more satisfying to eat imo

  On 3/3/2018 at 10:01 PM, Bechuga said:

The snowboarding shop fifty feet from where I live is closed due to the snow.

 

That's like a dispensary closing due to too many taco trucks.  :blink:

Movie poster designs are so crappy and bland these days. What was the last good one? That cool Black Swan one maybe?

Umm, you might have heard of a little movie called "Chef" ("Chef")

 

Worst-Movie-Posters-23.jpg

 

(Via the Moby edgelorde thread)

Edited by Bob Dobalina
  On 3/4/2018 at 3:15 PM, Plum said:

Movie poster designs are so crappy and bland these days. What was the last good one? That cool Black Swan one maybe?

 

what do you mean this is dynamic and brilliant

 

skyfall-movie-poster-james-bond-daniel-c

 

turdslide

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×