Say your goodbyes to McGriff in here

  On 4/8/2012 at 3:29 AM, dr lopez said:

  On 4/8/2012 at 2:56 AM, Candiru said:

Look at the history of dictatorships. Things are gonna get gnarly around here. The chickens have come home to roost, my children.

this is theoretically interesting

I think we can all make things very interesting. You can't ban everyone.

L

O

Chen, I'd like to say that, although I can be argumentative, I certainly wasn't angry at you, and I hope I wasn't perceived as being so. I think the defenses of the deletion of the Nice Tits thread were a bit confused after it happened, and that bugged me intellectually. I liked the Nice Tits thread, and I'd like to see its return, but I can appreciate some arguments against it.

To those saying that no women were bothered by the Nice Tits thread, I do remember rixxx saying that it gave this place the atmosphere of a boys club, and that made her feel less like posting. So if you're uncomfortable with alienating some members, that's something to consider.

Of course the more passionate the goodbyes we post, the more difficult it makes it for mcgriff to slip back in without embarrassment. Perhaps we should just chill a bit...

naw man, you're all good (Root5) - i never got anything like an angry vibe from your posts in the thread.

  On 4/8/2012 at 4:53 AM, lumpenprol said:

Of course the more passionate the goodbyes we post, the more difficult it makes it for mcgriff to slip back in without embarrassment. Perhaps we should just chill a bit...

Yes I'm an internet expert and this is perfectly plausible.

  On 4/8/2012 at 4:51 AM, Root5 said:

To those saying that no women were bothered by the Nice Tits thread, I do remember rixxx saying that it gave this place the atmosphere of a boys club, and that made her feel less like posting. So if you're uncomfortable with alienating some members, that's something to consider.

I don't think it separated along gender lines tho, if anything it just separated the more puritanical minded from the more liberal. I mean yegg was the biggest offender in terms of posting vile content on watmm, and she was, apparently, a girl. But again, it was all contained tidily within that thread and a few others (nice cocks, and whatever that chubby pepperoni nipple thread was that abusive george and a few other liked)

and yes, the deletion of that and other threads was done in a very abrupt and autocratic fashion...could have given people advanced warning. And I am still completely baffled when people proposed that the nonsense/crap forum be open for posting, that JR said no. That seems the most logical solution, I'm happy to be labeled as "nonsense/crap" as long as I have a place to call home where I can post whatever I want without censorship. I also think it would have been quite interesting to watch everyone migrate to nonsense-crap forum in that scenario, until genban would be left a useless husk...lol

  On 4/8/2012 at 4:54 AM, chenGOD said:

naw man, you're all good (Root5) - i never got anything like an angry vibe from your posts in the thread.

Cool.

Was it you or chaosmachine I had a long debate with about the meaning of objectification a couple months back?

you cant even post whatever you want on /b, so I don't know where you could find a place that would suit you...

edit: root5, probably me - objectification of women in porn.

roman's helmet's

just to let everyone in here know, out of respect for Fred, I will pledge not to interrupt a rolling LOL within this thread. Savor this moment, because outside of this thread I will hunt down and kill rolling LOL's like a rabid Icewolf.

lol

lol

lol

lol

lol

  On 4/8/2012 at 5:02 AM, Velazquez said:

roman's helmet's

The Queen's Bridge!

  On 4/7/2012 at 4:29 PM, iep said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 4:22 PM, Macca said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:21 PM, Adam Beker said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:20 PM, Bewarethefriendlyfoil said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:19 PM, kaini said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:15 PM, Rambo said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 2:55 PM, Plum said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 2:42 PM, messiaen said:

i know i sound like a broken record but i just literally cannot understand why joyrex has decided to destroy what was a truely fantastic forum with this kiddie rules bullshit.

 

i still come because i have no idea where else to go, but seriously, it kinda hurts inside.

 

you cultivated a truely awesome forum joyrex, and now youve decided to just destroy it. it makes no sens eot me

lol

lol

L O L

it's working

  On 4/8/2012 at 4:51 AM, Root5 said:

To those saying that no women were bothered by the Nice Tits thread, I do remember rixxx saying that it gave this place the atmosphere of a boys club, and that made her feel less like posting. So if you're uncomfortable with alienating some members, that's something to consider.

Yea, by alienate the womens I meant rixxx, but I do agree with her. Some times there were 3 different "Nice ____ threads" on the 1st page of general banter. It kind of made us look trashy.

  On 4/8/2012 at 6:45 AM, Ego said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 4:29 PM, iep said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 4:22 PM, Macca said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:21 PM, Adam Beker said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:20 PM, Bewarethefriendlyfoil said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:19 PM, kaini said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 3:15 PM, Rambo said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 2:55 PM, Plum said:

  On 4/7/2012 at 2:42 PM, messiaen said:

i know i sound like a broken record but i just literally cannot understand why joyrex has decided to destroy what was a truely fantastic forum with this kiddie rules bullshit.

 

i still come because i have no idea where else to go, but seriously, it kinda hurts inside.

 

you cultivated a truly awesome forum joyrex, and now you've decided to just destroy it. it makes no sense to me

Joyrex, of course, is just going to ignore this thread and wait until we forget about it. Smart move on his part, I guess.